首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >Sedation for oocyte retrieval using target controlled infusion of propofol and incremental alfentanil delivered by non-anaesthetists.
【24h】

Sedation for oocyte retrieval using target controlled infusion of propofol and incremental alfentanil delivered by non-anaesthetists.

机译:使用非麻醉医生提供的靶控输注异丙酚和递增的阿芬太尼进行镇静,以恢复卵母细胞。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Oocyte retrieval is a procedure where sedation is recommended. This paper presents the process of setting up a new, non-anaesthetist delivered service in our institution, the development of safety systems and the audit data we have used to assure quality, effectiveness and safety. Logbook data were collected for 4342 cases, with detailed audit data collected for 260 cases. Safety is acceptable with a respiratory adverse incident rate of 0.5/1000 (95% CI 0.1-1.6/1000 cases). Unplanned, direct anaesthetic assistance was required in 3.5/1000 cases (95% CI 1.7-5.3/1000 cases). Anaesthetic advice was required in 7.5% cases (95% CI 4.2-10.7%) at the inception of the service, but rarely once established: 0.6% (95% CI 0.2-1.0%). Nearly all patients (99%) would have the same sedation method again, no patients required admission, and patients' co-operation was judged by the operating surgeon as very good or good in 91% of cases.
机译:卵母细胞取回是推荐镇静的过程。本文介绍了在我们机构中建立新的,非麻醉师提供的服务的过程,安全系统的开发以及我们用来确保质量,有效性和安全性的审核数据。收集了4342个案例的日志数据,并收集了260个案例的详细审核数据。安全性是可接受的,呼吸不良事件发生率为0.5 / 1000(95%CI 0.1-1.6 / 1000例)。 3.5 / 1000例(95%CI 1.7-5.3 / 1000例)需要计划外的直接麻醉协助。服务开始时,有7.5%的病例(95%CI为4.2-10.7%)需要麻醉建议,但很少建议使用:0.6%(95%CI为0.2-1.0%)。几乎所有患者(99%)都会再次使用相同的镇静方法,没有患者需要入院,手术外科医生认为患者的合作非常好(91%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号