首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia and intensive care >Towards the elimination of duplication in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
【24h】

Towards the elimination of duplication in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

机译:致力于消除重复麻醉和重症监护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Duplication without proper attribution of the publications of others (plagiarism) and of the authors' own published works (redundancy or self-plagiarism) remains a common problem in the medical literature1-2. This is despite general agreement that the practice is unethical and despite clear statements to this effect by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (IOMJE; www.icmje.org), the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE; www.publicationethics. org.uk) and in the instructions to authors published by most medical journals including Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. Under some circumstances, and with appropriate acknowledgement, secondary publication can be both acceptable and beneficial.
机译:在他人的出版物(抄袭)和作者自己发表的作品(冗余或自我抄袭)中,没有适当注明出处的重复仍然是医学文献1-2中的普遍问题。尽管普遍同意这种做法是不道德的,并且尽管国际医学期刊编辑委员会(IOMJE; www.icmje.org),出版道德委员会(COPE; www.publicationethics.org.uk)对此做了明确声明。 )以及大多数医学期刊(包括麻醉和重症监护)发表的作者说明中。在某些情况下,并且得到适当的承认,二次出版既可以接受,也可以是有益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号