Comparison of fibrescope guided intubation via the classic laryngeal mask airway and i-gel in a manikin.

摘要

We compared the classic laryngeal mask airway and i-gel as adjuncts to fibrescope guided intubation in a manikin. Two methods of intubation were compared with each device: the tracheal tube directly over the fibrescope; and the tracheal tube over an Aintree Intubation Catheter. Thirty-two anaesthetists took part in this randomised crossover study. Each anaesthetist performed two intubations with each method via each device. The mean (SD) time for the first intubation using the tracheal tube over the fibrescope was 43 (24) s with the classic laryngeal mask airway and 22 (9) s with the i-gel (95% CI for the difference 12-30 s, p < 0.0001). The mean (SD) times for the first intubation when using the Aintree Intubation Catheter was 46 (24) s with the classic laryngeal mask airway and 37 (9) s with the i-gel (95% CI for the difference 5-12 s, p < 0.0001). We recorded five (5/64, 8%) oesophageal intubations when using the classic laryngeal mask airway and none when using the i-gel. The participants rated the ease of railroading of the tracheal tube and railroading the Aintree Intubation Catheter over the fibrescope to be significantly easier (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.002 respectively) when using the i-gel than when using the classic laryngeal mask airway. Furthermore, 30/32 (94%) of anaesthetists reported preference for the i-gel over the classic laryngeal mask airway for fibrescope guided tracheal intubation when managing a difficult airway. We conclude that the i-gel is likely to be a more appropriate conduit than the classic laryngeal mask airway for fibrescope guided intubation irrespective of the intubation method used.