...
首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia and intensive care >A pilot study of short-term high-pressure support ventilation in persistent sudden-onset rapid breathing.
【24h】

A pilot study of short-term high-pressure support ventilation in persistent sudden-onset rapid breathing.

机译:持续性突然发作的快速呼吸中短期高压支持通气的初步研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Sudden-onset rapid breathing commonly occurs in previously calm, invasively-ventilated patients. In most cases it can be resolved easily by traditional management techniques, but other cases can be very challenging. We enrolled 40 patients who failed traditional interventions and performed short-term high-pressure support ventilation (HPSV). Thirty-three (83%) patients were responsive to HPSV. In the responders, ten minute HPSV reduced mean airway pressure (P=0.030), minute ventilation (P <0.001), respiratory rate (P <0.001) and heart rate (P <0.001) compared to before HPSV therapy. It also stabilised tidal volume (P <0.001) and improved oxygenation (P=0.007). After 58 minutes, HPSV relieved tachypnoea. However, compared with the responders, the non-responders (7/40, 17%) were younger (77.0 versus 59.7 years, P=0.002), and had higher Glasgow Coma Scale score (9.0 versus 14.0, P <0.001), pressure support (P=0.029), peak pressure (P=0.048) and heart rate (P=0.004) before sudden-onset rapid breathing. The non-responders also had higher peak pressure (P=0.046), minute ventilation (P=0.024), respiratory rate (P=0.027) and heart rate (P <0.001) when the rapid breathing happened. At or before sudden-onset rapid breathing, peak pressure, minute ventilation and heart rate had a high accuracy to predict the non-responsive patients (each with area under the curve of ≥0.7). The age and Glasgow Coma Scale also had high predicted ability (both with areas under the curve of ≥0.8). In conclusion, short-term HPSV relieved persistent sudden-onset rapid breathing. However, it was not effective in the relatively young and conscious patients with relatively high support pressure, peak pressure, minute ventilation and heart rate.
机译:突然发作的快速呼吸通常发生在先前平静,有创通气的患者中。在大多数情况下,可以通过传统的管理技术轻松解决该问题,但其他情况可能会非常具有挑战性。我们招募了40名传统干预措施失败并进行短期高压支持通气(HPSV)的患者。 33例(83%)患者对HPSV有反应。在应答者中,与HPSV治疗前相比,十分钟HPSV降低了平均气道压力(P = 0.030),分钟通气(P <0.001),呼吸频率(P <0.001)和心率(P <0.001)。它还稳定了潮气量(P <0.001)并改善了氧合(P = 0.007)。 58分钟后,HPSV缓解了呼吸困难。但是,与反应者相比,无反应者(7 / 40,17%)更年轻(77.0比59.7岁,P = 0.002),并且格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分更高(9.0比14.0,P <0.001),压力突然发作快速呼吸之前的支持(P = 0.029),峰值压力(P = 0.048)和心率(P = 0.004)。发生快速呼吸时,无反应者的峰值压力(P = 0.046),分钟通气(P = 0.024),呼吸频率(P = 0.027)和心率(P <0.001)也较高。在突发性快速呼吸之前或之前,峰值压力,分钟通气量和心率具有较高的准确性,可以预测无反应的患者(每人的曲线下面积≥0.7)。年龄和格拉斯哥昏迷量表也具有较高的预测能力(曲线下面积均≥0.8)。总之,短期HPSV缓解了持续性突然发作的快速呼吸。但是,对于支持压力,峰值压力,分钟通气量和心率较高的相对年轻和清醒的患者,该方法无效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号