...
首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus staff screening and decolonisation.
【24h】

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus staff screening and decolonisation.

机译:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的工作人员筛查和非殖民化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Dr Cross, in his editorial on mass screening of hospital staff for methicillin-resis-tant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [1], mentions only briefly, failure of decolonisation as a disadvantage. He did not, I* feel, sufficiently expand on the serious implications of what decolonisation failure actually means for staff. 'Simple' MRSA eradication with topical treatment fails in anything from 7% to 18% of cases even after repeated regimes [2, 3]. Measures employed thereafter, to clear MRSA from those persistently colonised, subsequently become more aggressive and harmful. Many have required prolonged treatment with systemic antimicrobials such as vancomycin and on occasions, healthcare workers have had to endure repeated decontamination of their homes whilst having multiple drug therapy at the same time.
机译:克罗斯(Cross)博士在对医院工作人员进行耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)大规模筛查的社论中[1],仅简要提到了非殖民化的失败是一个不利因素。我*感到,他没有充分理解非殖民化失败对员工的实际意义。即使在重复治疗后,局部治疗也无法“简单”地根除MRSA,在7%到18%的病例中均无效[2,3]。此后采取的措施,从那些长期定居的人群中清除MRSA,随后变得更具侵略性和危害性。许多人需要使用万古霉素等全身性抗生素进行长时间治疗,有时,医护人员不得不忍受反复的房屋消毒,同时还要进行多种药物治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号