【24h】

Disease status and use of ventilatory support by ALS patients

机译:ALS患者的疾病状况和使用通气支持

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Use of mechanical ventilation (MV), administered either invasively via tracheostomy, or more commonly non-invasively (CPAP, BiPAP), appears to be increasing in ALS. No prospective databases exist that describe the behavior of physicians and patients and the criteria for instituting MV in ALS. METHODS: 387 placebo patients in a Phase lll trial of r-methHuBDNF were followed for 9 months. Although the use of MV was not the primary end-point of the trial, information was gathered regarding it by cataloging respiratory adverse events and tracking health resource utilization. RESULTS: 35 of 387 patients utilized MV during the trial. Twenty-eight (7%) patients received BiPAP. Seven (2%) were tracheotomized without first receiving BiPAP. Forced vital capacity (FVC): BiPAP patients had a mean (±SEM) FVC% of 71.8 ± 2.8% and ALSFRS of 27.7 ± 1.0 at baseline; non-BiPAP patients had a mean baseline FVC% of 88.7 ± 10%, and an ALSFRS of 30.3 ± 0.3. Symptom duration at entry was similar for both groups (2.1 ± 0.4 years vs. 2.1 ± 0.1 years). At the time of first use of BiPAP, average FVC% was 47.5 ± 4.0% and ALSFRS score was 22.4 ± 1.5. The range of FVC% at start of BiPAP was 15-87. The nine-month survival was 67.9% for BiPAP patients vs. 86% for non-BiPAP patients. The use of BiPAP varied tremendously among the 38 study sites, with some not employing it at all and others using it in as many as 40% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 9% of placebo patients who received MV, BiPAP patients were more rapidly progressing than non-BIPAP patients, and showed a greater eventual mortality rate. Patients began MV at a wide range of values of FVC%, and centers differed in their prescribing practices. Factors influencing BiPAP use are complex, and not strictly related to FVC%.
机译:通过气管切开术侵入性或更普遍地以非侵入性方式(CPAP,BiPAP)进行机械通气(MV)的使用似乎在ALS中正在增加。没有任何前瞻性数据库可以描述医师和患者的行为以及在ALS中建立MV的标准。方法:在r-methHuBDNF的III期试验中,对387名安慰剂患者进行了9个月的随访。尽管使用MV不是试验的主要终点,但通过对呼吸不良事件进行分类并跟踪健康资源的使用情况,收集了有关MV的信息。结果:387名患者中有35名在试验期间使用了MV。二十八(7%)名患者接受了BiPAP。七名(2%)在未首先接受BiPAP的情况下进行了气管切开术。强迫肺活量(FVC):基线时BiPAP患者的平均FVC%(±SEM)为71.8±2.8%,ALSFRS为27.7±1.0;非BiPAP患者的平均基线FVC%为88.7±10%,ALSFRS为30.3±0.3。两组的入组症状持续时间相似(2.1±0.4年vs. 2.1±0.1年)。首次使用BiPAP时,平均FVC%为47.5±4.0%,而ALSFRS得分为22.4±1.5。 BiPAP开始时FVC%的范围是15-87。 BiPAP患者的9个月生存率为67.9%,而非BiPAP患者为86%。在38个研究地点中,BiPAP的使用差异很大,其中一些根本不使用BiPAP,而其他人则在多达40%的患者中使用了BiPAP。结论:在9%接受MV的安慰剂患者中,BiPAP患者比非BIPAP患者进展更快,并且最终死亡率更高。患者开始MV时的FVC%值范围很广,并且各中心的处方习惯不同。影响BiPAP使用的因素很复杂,与FVC%并不严格相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号