...
首页> 外文期刊>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis eofficial publication of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases >A comparison of assisted cough techniques in stable patients with severe respiratory insufficiency due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
【24h】

A comparison of assisted cough techniques in stable patients with severe respiratory insufficiency due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

机译:稳定型肌萎缩性侧索硬化引起的严重呼吸功能不全患者的辅助咳嗽技术比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Cough can be impaired in ALS. This can result in peak cough flows (PCFs) too low for an adequate airway clearance (<270 l/mn). There are several cough assistance techniques that aim at a better elimination of airway secretions, but which are effective, especially in bulbar patients, is not known. We designed the present investigation to compare the PCFs produced by a range of manual and mechanical techniques in patients with ALS, in non-bulbar but also in bulbar patients. In the whole study population, PCFs ranged from 84 (35-118) l/mn for the spontaneous cough manoeuvre to 488 (243-605) l/min for the in/exsufflator (p = 0.0005). In the bulbar group, these values were 42 (35-130) l/min versus 436 (244-630) l/min, respectively (p = 0.008), and 89 (40-106) l/min versus 491 (192-580) l/min, respectively, in the non-bulbar group (p = 0.019). There was no statistically significant difference between the bulbar and the non-bulbar groups. The in/exsufflator was not always the best tool. We conclude that capacity of coughing efforts to produce efficient peak cough flows can be dramatically improved with different tools, even in patients with very severe bulbar symptoms and that it appears useful to test an array of techniques to optimally tailor cough improvement techniques to individual patients.
机译:ALS中的咳嗽可能会受损。这可能会导致峰值咳嗽流量(PCF)太低而无法获得足够的气道间隙(<270 l / mn)。有几种旨在更好地消除气道分泌物的咳嗽辅助技术,但尚未见效,尤其是在延髓患者中有效。我们设计了本研究,以比较在ALS患者,非灯泡患者和延髓患者中,通过一系列手动和机械技术生产的PCF。在整个研究人群中,自发性咳嗽动作的PCF范围从84(35-118)l / mn到鼓入/吹气者的488(243-605)l / min(p = 0.0005)。在延髓组中,这些值分别为42(35-130)l / min与436(244-630)l / min(p = 0.008),以及89(40-106)l / min与491(192-192)在非灯泡组中分别为580)l / min(p = 0.019)。延髓和非延髓组之间无统计学差异。 in / exsufflator并不总是最好的工具。我们得出的结论是,即使在患有非常严重的延髓症状的患者中,使用不同的工具也可以显着提高咳嗽努力产生有效峰值咳嗽流量的能力,并且测试一系列技术以最佳地针对个别患者调整咳嗽改善技术似乎很有用。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号