首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics >Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in adults with skeletal open bite between conventional edgewise treatment and implant-anchored orthodontics.
【24h】

Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in adults with skeletal open bite between conventional edgewise treatment and implant-anchored orthodontics.

机译:常规边缘治疗与植入物锚定正畸之间成人骨骼开放性咬合的正畸治疗效果比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Open bites are known to be difficult malocclusions to treat. Generally, with conventional edgewise treatment, incisor extrusion rather than molar intrusion is observed. Recently, the use of miniscrews as anchorage has markedly increased. In this study, orthodontic treatment outcomes after conventional edgewise treatment and implant-anchored treatment were investigated by cephalometric analysis and several occlusal indexes. In addition, the stability of these patients 2 years after the retention phase was also analyzed. METHODS: Thirty adults (15 for nonimplant treatment [non-IA group] and 15 for implant-anchored treatment [IA group]) were our subjects. Cephalometric analysis, peer assessment rating, discrepancy index, and objective grading system were used. RESULTS: From the cephalometric values in the non-IA group, open-bite patients were generally treated by extrusion of the maxillary and mandibular incisors that resulted in clockwise rotation of the mandibular plane angle. In the IA group, intrusion of the maxillary and mandibular molars that resulted in counterclockwise rotation was noted. Furthermore, in the IA group, the soft-tissue analysis showed decreases in the facial convexity and the inferior labial sulcus angle that resulted in the disappearance of incompetent lips. In the retention phase, extrusion of the mandibular molars was observed in the IA group. From the objective grading system evaluation, significant reductions of overbite in canines and premolars were observed in both groups. Furthermore, less stability was observed in the IA group compared with the non-IA group according to the total objective grading system score. CONCLUSIONS: Ideal occlusion can be achieved in adults with severe open bite with both conventional edgewise and implant-anchored orthodontic treatment. However, absolute intrusion of the molars and improvement in esthetics might be achieved more effectively by using miniscrews as an anchorage device. In addition, since a significant amount of tooth movement occurs with miniscrews, careful attention is required during the retention phase.
机译:简介:众所周知,开放性咬伤很难治疗。通常,在常规的边缘处理中,观察到门牙挤出而不是磨牙侵入。近来,使用微螺钉作为锚固已显着增加。在这项研究中,通过头颅测量和一些咬合指数研究了常规边缘治疗和植入物锚定治疗后的正畸治疗结果。此外,还对保留期2年后这些患者的稳定性进行了分析。方法:30名成人(非植入治疗15例(非IA组)和植入锚固治疗的15例(IA组))是我们的研究对象。使用头颅测量分析,同伴评估等级,差异指数和客观评分系统。结果:从非IA组的头颅测量值来看,开放性咬合患者通常通过上颌和下颌切牙的挤压治疗,从而导致下颌平面角的顺时针旋转。在IA组中,注意到导致逆时针旋转的上颌和下颌磨牙的侵入。此外,在IA组中,软组织分析显示面部凸度和下唇沟角减小,从而导致不称职的嘴唇消失。在保留期,IA组观察到下颌磨牙的挤出。从客观的评分系统评估来看,两组的犬齿和前磨牙的咬合都明显减少。此外,根据总的客观评分系统评分,与非IA组相比,IA组的稳定性较差。结论:采用常规边缘和种植体锚定的正畸治疗,在严重开放性咬合的成年人中可以实现理想的咬合。然而,通过使用微型螺钉作为锚固装置,可以更有效地实现磨牙的绝对侵入和美学改善。此外,由于使用小螺钉会产生大量的牙齿运动,因此在保持阶段需要特别注意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号