首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Dentistry >A Comparison of pical Root Resorption in Incisors after Fixed Orthodontic Treatment with Standard Edgewise and Straight Wire (MBT) Method
【2h】

A Comparison of pical Root Resorption in Incisors after Fixed Orthodontic Treatment with Standard Edgewise and Straight Wire (MBT) Method

机译:固定正畸治疗后采用标准的边向和直线(MBT)方法进行切牙后牙根吸收的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Statement of Problem: One of the major outcomes of orthodontic treatment is the apical root resorption of teeth moved during the treatment. Identifying the possible risk factors, are necessary for every orthodontist. >Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the rate of apical root resorption after fixed orthodontic treatment with standard edgewise and straight wire (MBT) method, and also to evaluate other factors effecting the rate of root resorption in orthodontic treatments. >Materials and Method: In this study, parallel periapical radiographs of 127 patients imaging a total of 737 individual teeth, were collected. A total of 76 patients were treated by standard edgewise and 51 patients by straight wire method. The periapical radiographs were scanned and then the percentage of root resorption was calculated by Photoshop software. The data were analyzed by Paired-Samples t-test and the Generalized Linear Model adopting the SPSS 15.0. >Results: In patients treated with straight wire method (MBT), mean root resorption was 18.26% compared to 14.82% in patients treated with standard edgewise technique (p< .05). Male patients had higher rate of root resorption,statistically significant (p< .05). Age at onset of treatment, duration of treatment, type of dental occlusion, premolar extractions and the use of intermaxillary elastics had no significant effect on the root resorption in this study. >Conclusion: Having more root resorption in the straight wire method and less in the standard edgewise technique can be attributed to more root movement in pre-adjusted MBT technique due to the brackets employed in this method.
机译:>问题陈述:正畸治疗的主要成果之一是治疗过程中移动的牙齿的根尖吸收。识别可能的风险因素,对于每位正畸医生都是必要的。 >目的:该研究的目的是比较采用标准的垂直和垂直线(MBT)方法固定固定的正畸治疗后的根尖吸收率,并评估其他影响根吸收率的因素。在正畸治疗中。 >材料和方法:在这项研究中,收集了127例患者的平行根尖X光片,对总共737颗独立牙齿成像。标准边缘法治疗76例,直线法治疗51例。扫描根尖周X光片,然后通过Photoshop软件计算根吸收的百分比。通过配对样本t检验和采用SPSS 15.0的广义线性模型对数据进行分析。 >结果:在采用直线法(MBT)治疗的患者中,平均牙根吸收率为18.26%,而在采用标准逐边缘技术治疗的患者中,平均牙根吸收率为14.82%(p <.05)。男性患者的根吸收率较高,具有统计学意义(p <.05)。在本研究中,治疗的年龄,治疗的持续时间,牙齿的咬合类型,前磨牙拔除以及使用颌间弹性对牙根吸收没有显着影响。 >结论:由于采用了方括号,因此在预调整的MBT技术中,根系吸收更多,而在直丝法中较少,而在标准边坡技术中较少,这可以归因于根系移动更多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号