首页> 外文期刊>Birth >Evidence-based change: can powerful professional interests be persuaded to do it?
【24h】

Evidence-based change: can powerful professional interests be persuaded to do it?

机译:以证据为基础的变革:能否说服强大的专业利益去做?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Midwifery care needs to be integrated into the system of care for women and childbearing families in the United States The evidence has been before us since those first studies of midwifery care by the Frontier Nursing Service in Kentucky and Maternity Center Association in New York City more than 80 years ago. The research on the effectiveness and safety of midwifery care provided in every setting, and in every population, is irrefutable. Yet its implementation is still resisted at every turn. Why? Why is it that "midwife," a word that simply means being "with woman" is so contentious in our society? We midwives are really not a bad lot of folks when you get to know us. I don't have the answer to "why," but I do feel that if we don't begin to make a paradigm shift in the ratio of obstetricians to midwives in the delivery of care to childbearing women and families in the United States, we will not fix the health care system. I will make three points on how to make this paradigm shift.
机译:美国需要将助产士护理纳入妇女和生育家庭的护理体系中。自从肯塔基州边防护理局和纽约市妇产中心协会对助产士护理进行的首次研究以来,证据就一直摆在我们面前。 80年前。在每个地方和每个人群中对助产护理的有效性和安全性进行的研究都是无可辩驳的。然而,它的实施仍然在任何时候都受到阻挠。为什么?为什么“助产士”这个词仅仅意味着“与女人在一起”在我们的社会中如此具有争议性?当您认识我们时,我们的助产士确实不是很多人。我没有“为什么”的答案,但是我确实感到,如果我们不开始在向美国育龄妇女和家庭提供医疗服务方面改变产科医生与助产士的比例,我们不会修复医疗体系。我将就如何进行这种范式转变提出三点意见。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Birth》 |2009年第2期|共2页
  • 作者

    Ernst EK;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 产科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号