...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics >In-vivo and in-vitro comparison of bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel and debonded at various times.
【24h】

In-vivo and in-vitro comparison of bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel and debonded at various times.

机译:牙釉质粘结和在不同时间脱粘结的正畸托槽粘结强度的体内和体外比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare in-vivo and in-vitro bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to human enamel and debonded at various times. An in-vivo debonding device was validated and used to measure bond strengths in the oral environment. METHODS: For the in-vitro study, mini-twin metallic premolar brackets (Opti-mesh XRT, Oromco Corp, Glendora, Calif) precoated with Transbond XT composite resin (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were bonded to 60 extracted premolars. The teeth were divided into 4 groups of 15, and shear bond strength was tested on a universal testing machine at 4 time periods: 10 minutes, 24 hours, 1 week, and 4 weeks. For the in-vivo test, 60 premolars in 22 volunteers (dental students) from King Saud University were bonded with Mini-Twin metallic premolar brackets and divided into 4 groups; bond strengths were measured at 10 minutes, 24 hours, 1 week, and 4 weeks. RESULTS: Statistical analysis with 1-way ANOVA at P <.05 showed no significant differences among the in-vitro or the in-vivo groups. Two-way ANOVA at P <.05 was used to compare the in-vitro results with the in-vivo results; the in-vivo group had significantly lower mean bond strength values. In addition, survival analysis, used to calculate the probability of bond failure at P <.05, confirmed the significant difference between in-vitro and in-vivo environments. CONCLUSIONS: Reported bond strength values are not time dependent.
机译:引言:本研究的目的是测量和比较在不同时间粘结到人牙釉质并脱粘的正畸托槽的体内和体外粘结强度。体内脱胶设备经过验证,可用于测量口腔环境中的粘合强度。方法:为进行体外研究,将预先涂有Transbond XT复合树脂(3M Unitek,蒙罗维亚,加利福尼亚州)的微型双金属前磨牙托槽(Opti-mesh XRT,Oromco Corp,Glendora,加利福尼亚)粘合到60个提取的前磨牙上。将牙齿分成15组的4组,并在万能试验机上以10分钟,24小时,1周和4周这4个时间段对剪切强度进行测试。为了进行体内试验,将来自沙特国王大学的22名志愿者(牙科学生)中的60个前磨牙与Mini-Twin金属前磨牙支架结合在一起,分为4组;每组4个。在10分钟,24小时,1周和4周时测量粘合强度。结果:在P <.05的情况下,采用1路ANOVA进行的统计分析表明,体外或体内组之间无显着差异。 P <.05时的双向ANOVA用于比较体外结果和体内结果。体内组的平均粘结强度值明显较低。此外,用于计算P <.05时键断裂失败的可能性的生存分析证实了体外环境和体内环境之间的显着差异。结论:报告的粘结强度值与时间无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号