【24h】

FULLERENES AS PROTOMINERALS

机译:富勒烯作为预体蛋白酶

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

An outburst of publications derived to fullerenes - nanometer in size carbon clusters, that were recently discovered in the Karelian shungites and some other natural specimens as well as synthesised in laboratory conditions (Kratschmer e. a., 1990; Curl, Smalley, 1991; Kroto e. a., 1991; Iijima, 1991; Buseck e. a., 1992; Daly e. a., 1993; Buseck, Hua, 1993; di Brozolo e. a., 1994; Fullerenes…, 1995 and some others) forces mineralogists to put a question whether these natural objects are minerals or not. In order to answer it, the revision of mineral classification principles would be conducted. Within the concept proposed by the author, fullerenes naturally stand at their place along with the other "controversial" objects (according to their belongingness to the mineral kingdom) that were formerly included in its amount by V.I. Vernadsky. In order to do it, the main mineralogical object - mineral - was imagined as an object-system and its three primary elements (the main triad) were established M = mE (implied by) siS (implied by) oS (where mE is a mineral embryo or protomineral, siS is a set of inner surfaces inserted into each other and composing the "crystal" body of a mineral, and oS is an outer surface). The members of the main triad in their turn consist of triads of subelements. Several well-known physics-chemical rules, principles and postulates of the mineralogy are proposed as system forming unity relations and compositional rules of the "mineral" object-system, according to which three main classes (systems) of minerals are established: cavyclusts, crystals and mineraloids (Povarennykh, 1991). Fullerenes and nanotubes are proposed to be classified as the first representatives of cavyclusts, and they may be treated as terrestrial analogues of protominerals. Their existence was logically predicted by the author well before their discovery in nature and evolving of the first publications devoted to fullerenes (Povarennykh, Onoprienko, 1986; Povarennykh, 1988, 1990). The characteristic features of fullerenes and nanotubes are summarised from the point of view of a mineralogist and .they are shown to possess the main one of them: surface as an immanent virtue of any mineral which on the contrary does not inherent to the objects of less evolved matter forms of the Universe such as atoms, molecules and elementary fractions.
机译:爆炸于富含群碳簇的富勒烯 - 纳米的出版物,最近在卡累来的Shungites和一些其他天然标本以及在实验室条件中合成(Kratschmer EA,1990; Curl,Smalley,1991; Kroto EA,1991; ; Iijima,1991; Buseck ea,1992; Daly ea,1993; Buseck,Hua,1993; Di Brozolo EA,1994;富勒烯......,1995年和其他一些人)迫使矿物学家对这些天然目的是矿物质的问题。为了回答它,将进行矿产分类原则的修订。在作者提出的概念中,富勒烯自然地站在他们的位置以及其他“争议”对象(根据他们的归属王国),以前包含在其金额的v.i. vernadsky。为了做到这一点,主要的矿物学对象 - 矿物 - 被想象成一个对象系统,并且它建立了三个主要元素(主三合会),建立了m = me(暗示)sis(暗示)OS(我是一个矿物胚胎或植物,SIS是一组内表面彼此插入并构成矿物的“晶体”体,OS是外表面)。主要三合会的成员轮到他们的子双程之一。提出了几种着名的物理化学规则,矿物学的原则和后的矿物质的统一关系和“矿物质”对象系统的组成规则,根据哪个矿物质的三个主要类(系统)是:凯氏菌,晶体和矿物(Povarennykh,1991)。提出富勒烯和纳米管被归类为静体的第一个代表,并且它们可能被视为前粒状体的陆地类似物。他们的存在在逻辑上,作者在逻辑上预测,在他们的性质上发现和发展富于富勒烯的第一个出版物(Povarennykh,Onovienko,1986; Povarennykh,1988,1990)。富勒烯和纳米管的特征从矿物学家的角度来说总结。他们被证明是拥有其中一个主要之一:表面作为任何矿物质的内在德文,相反的是不固有的不属于较少的物体宇宙的进化形式,如原子,分子和基本级分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号