首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Ophthalmology: The International Journal of Ophthalmology >Comparison of Travoprost and Bimatoprost plus timolol fixed combinations in open-angle glaucoma patients previously treated with latanoprost plus timolol fixed combination.
【24h】

Comparison of Travoprost and Bimatoprost plus timolol fixed combinations in open-angle glaucoma patients previously treated with latanoprost plus timolol fixed combination.

机译:先前接受拉坦前列素加噻吗洛尔固定组合治疗的开角型青光眼患者中特拉沃前列素和比马前列素加噻吗洛尔固定组合的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the ocular hypotensive effect of bimatoprost plus timolol and travoprost plus timolol fixed combinations in glaucoma patients whose disease was controlled but had not reached their target intraocular pressure (IOP) with the fixed combination of latanoprost plus timolol. DESIGN: A 2 x 3-month, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-masked, cross-over clinical trial. METHODS: Eighty-nine open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients were included. After a 6-week run-in period with latanoprost plus timolol, patients were randomized to either travoprost plus timolol or bimatoprost plus timolol for 3 months. Patients then switched to the opposite therapy for 3 additional months. The primary end point was the comparison of mean daily IOP after 3 months of each treatment. RESULTS: At baseline, mean IOP was 16.5 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 16.0 to 17.0 mm Hg) with treatment with latanoprost plus timolol. Both bimatoprost plus timolol and travoprost plus timolol statistically significantly reduced the mean IOP from baseline (P < .0001). Mean IOP at month 3 was statistically significantly lower in the bimatoprost plus timolol group compared with the travoprost plus timolol group (14.7 mm Hg [95% confidence interval, 14.3 to 15.3 mm Hg] vs 15.4 mm Hg [95% confidence interval, 15.0 to 15.9 mm Hg]; P = .0041). IOP was lower during bimatoprost plus timolol treatment at all time points and statistical significance was reached at 8 am, 11 am, and 5 pm, but not at 2 pm and 8 pm. Both treatments showed similar tolerability profile. CONCLUSIONS: Bimatoprost plus timolol and travoprost plus timolol can provide additional IOP-lowering effect in patients not fully controlled with latanoprost plus timolol. The observed additional IOP reduction was greater with bimatoprost plus timolol with a similar tolerability profile.
机译:目的:比较比马前列素加噻吗洛尔和曲伏前列素加替莫洛固定组合对患有疾病但仍未达到目标眼压(IOP)的青光眼患者的固定降压作用。设计:一项为期2 x 3个月的多中心,前瞻性,随机,双掩蔽,交叉临床试验。方法:纳入89例开角型青光眼(OAG)患者。在使用拉坦前列素加噻吗洛尔进行为期6周的磨合期后,患者被随机分入travoprost加替莫洛或比马前列素加替莫洛尔3个月。然后,患者又改用相反的疗法治疗3个月。主要终点是每次治疗3个月后平均每日IOP的比较。结果:基线时,经拉坦前列素加噻吗洛尔治疗的平均眼压为16.5 mm Hg(95%置信区间16.0至17.0 mm Hg)。比马前列素加噻吗洛尔和特拉沃前列素加替莫洛在统计学上均显着降低了基线时的平均眼压(P <.0001)。相比travoprost + timolol组,比马前列素+ timolol组在第3个月的平均IOP在统计学上显着降低(14.7 mm Hg [95%置信区间,14.3至15.3 mm Hg]与15.4 mm Hg [95%置信区间,15.0至15.9 mm Hg]; P = .0041)。在比马前列素加噻吗洛尔治疗期间,所有时间点的IOP均较低,并且在上午8点,上午11点和下午5点达到统计学显着性,但下午2点和晚上8点没有达到统计学意义。两种处理均显示出相似的耐受性。结论:对于未经拉坦前列素加噻吗洛尔完全控制的患者,比马前列素加噻吗洛尔和曲普前列素加替莫洛可进一步降低眼压。使用比马前列素加噻吗洛尔具有相似的耐受性,观察到的额外IOP降低更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号