首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Veterinary Research >Mechanical properties of various suture materials and placement patterns tested with surrogate in vitro model constructs simulating laryngeal advancement tie-forward procedures in horses.
【24h】

Mechanical properties of various suture materials and placement patterns tested with surrogate in vitro model constructs simulating laryngeal advancement tie-forward procedures in horses.

机译:各种体外缝合材料的机械性能和放置模式,通过替代体外模型构造体进行模拟,模拟了马的喉前进牵开过程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the mechanical properties of laryngeal tie-forward (LTF) surrogate constructs prepared with steel fixtures and No. 5 braided polyester or braided polyethylene by use of a standard or a modified suture placement technique. Sample: 32 LTF surrogate constructs. Procedures: Surrogate constructs were prepared with steel fixtures and sutures (polyester or polyethylene) by use of a standard or modified suture placement technique. Constructs underwent single-load-to-failure testing. Maximal load at failure, elongation at failure, stiffness, and suture breakage sites were compared among constructs prepared with polyester sutures by means of the standard (n=10) or modified (10) technique and those prepared with polyethylene sutures with the standard (6) or modified (6) technique. Results: Polyethylene suture constructs had higher stiffness, higher load at failure, and lower elongation at failure than did polyester suture constructs. Constructs prepared with the modified technique had higher load at failure than did those prepared with the standard technique for both suture materials. All sutures broke at the knot in constructs prepared with the standard technique. Sutures broke at a location away from the knot in 13 of 16 constructs prepared with the modified technique (3 such constructs with polyethylene sutures broke at the knot). Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: Results suggested LTF surrogate constructs prepared with polyethylene sutures or the modified technique were stronger than those prepared with polyester sutures or the standard technique.
机译:目的:通过标准或改进的缝合线放置技术,比较由钢制夹具和5号编织聚酯或编织聚乙烯制成的喉头前移(LTF)替代结构的机械性能。样本:32个LTF替代结构。步骤:通过使用标准或改良的缝合线放置技术,用钢制夹具和缝合线(聚酯或聚乙烯)制备替代结构。构造进行了单次加载到失败的测试。比较了使用标准(n = 10)或改良(10)技术的聚酯缝合线和使用标准(6)聚乙烯缝合线制备的结构的破坏时的最大载荷,破坏时的伸长率,刚度和缝合线断裂部位。 )或修改(6)的技术。结果:与聚酯缝合线结构相比,聚乙烯缝合线结构具有更高的刚度,更高的破坏载荷和更低的断裂伸长率。对于两种缝合线材料,使用改良技术制备的结构均比采用标准技术制备的结构具有更高的破坏载荷。用标准技术制备的结构中的所有缝线都打结了。在用改良技术制备的16种结构中的13种中,缝合线在远离结的位置处破裂(3种具有聚乙烯缝合线的此类结构在结处破裂)。结论和临床意义:结果表明,用聚乙烯缝合线或改良技术制备的LTF替代结构比用聚酯缝合线或标准技术制备的LTF替代结构更强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号