...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Veterinary Research >Comparison of results for commercially available microbiological media plates with results for standard bacteriologic testing of bovine milk.
【24h】

Comparison of results for commercially available microbiological media plates with results for standard bacteriologic testing of bovine milk.

机译:将市售微生物培养基板的结果与牛乳的标准细菌学检测结果进行比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective - To compare results for 3 commercially available microbiological media plates with those for standard bacteriologic testing of bovine milk. Sample - Milk samples from postpartum cows and cows with a high somatic cell count (SCC) or clinical mastitis (CM). Procedures - Sample-ready Staphylococcus culture medium (SRSC) plates were used to detect Staphylococcus aureus in milk samples obtained from postpartum cows and cows with a high SCC or CM. Rapid coliform count (RCC) plates were used to detect coliforms in milk samples obtained from cows with CM. Aerobic count (AC) plates were used to detect streptococci in CM samples. Fresh mastitic milk samples were frozen and then thawed to evaluate the effects of freezing for the SRSC and RCC plates. The effects of dilution (1:10) of samples were determined. Agreement of results between the commercially available plates and standard bacteriologic testing was evaluated. Results - The ability of SRSC plates to detect S. aureus in milk samples was highest with diluted samples from postpartum cows and cows with a high SCC or CM. Sensitivity of the RCC plate for detection of coliforms was highest with diluted mastitic milk samples. The AC plates had a poor positive predictive value for detection of streptococci in mastitic milk samples. Freezing increased S. aureus detection. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance - Overall, the SRSC and RCC plates were accurate, were easy to use, and yielded results comparable to those of standard bacteriologic testing for the detection of S. aureus and coliforms in bovine milk.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.72.12.1622
机译:目的-比较3种市售微生物培养基板和牛乳标准细菌学检测板的结果。样本-产后奶牛和体细胞计数(SCC)高或临床乳腺炎(CM)高的奶牛的牛奶样本。程序-使用现成的葡萄球菌培养基(SRSC)板检测从产后奶牛和高SCC或CM奶牛获得的牛奶样品中的金黄色葡萄球菌。快速大肠菌群计数(RCC)板用于检测从带有CM的奶牛获得的牛奶样品中的大肠菌群。有氧计数板用于检测CM样品中的链球菌。将新鲜的乳香牛奶样品冷冻,然后解冻以评估冷冻对SRSC和RCC板的影响。确定样品稀释度(1:10)的影响。评估了市售平板与标准细菌学测试结果的一致性。结果-SRSC平板检测 S的能力。牛奶样品中的金黄色葡萄球菌含量最高,产后奶牛和SCC或CM高的奶牛的稀释样品最高。使用稀释的乳香牛奶样品,RCC板检测大肠菌的灵敏度最高。 AC板对乳脂样品中链球菌的检测具有较差的阳性预测值。冻结增加了。金黄色检测。结论和临床意义-总体而言,SRSC和RCC平板准确,易于使用,并且产生的结果可与标准细菌学检测结果相媲美,以检测 S。牛乳中的金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠菌群。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.72.12.1622

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号