...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Veterinary Research >Mapping and measuring disparities in welfare for cats across neighborhoods in a large US city
【24h】

Mapping and measuring disparities in welfare for cats across neighborhoods in a large US city

机译:绘制和测量美国大城市中各社区猫的福利差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective-To determine whether disparities in health and welfare among cats are present within neighborhoods and across census tracts in a large US city, and to compare results with area-level human data.Sample Population-17,587 cat intake records from 2 animal sheltering organizations serving Boston, and summary data from city animal control authorities for a 5-year period (2004 through 2008).Procedures-Geocoded addresses (n = 15,285) were spatially joined to neighborhood and census tract polygons. Cat intakes and deaths were calculated per capita and compared with human demographic and death data. Poisson mixed-effects models were used to smooth mortality rates and calculate relative risks.Results-Data from geocoded records indicated that annual rates of cat intakes and deaths ranged widely (0.85 to 10.3 cats/1,000 persons and 0.27 to 3.9 cats/1,000 persons, respectively) within 16 neighborhoods of Boston. The disparity across 156 census tracts that comprised these neighborhoods was even greater (0.10 to 22.1 cats/1,000 persons and 0.15 to 6.47 cats/1,000 persons for intakes and deaths, respectively). Cat deaths were significantly correlated with human premature deaths at the neighborhood level (R-2 = 0.77). Overall, annual per capita city-wide shelter-associated mortality rate for cats (estimated at approx 2.6 cats/1,000 persons) was similar to rates in other progressive communities.Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-By use of geospatial techniques, 14- to 40-fold gradients in cat deaths were detected across Boston neighborhoods and census tracts. Cat deaths were associated with human premature deaths and socioeconomic indicators reflecting deprivation. Targeted interventions may be effective in resolving these disparities. (Am J Vet Res 2010;71:161-168)
机译:目的-确定美国大城市附近和跨人口普查区域是否存在猫之间的健康和福利差异,并将结果与​​地区级人类数据进行比较。样本来自两个服务于动物庇护组织的17587人的猫摄入记录波士顿,以及城市动物管理局5年(2004年至2008年)的汇总数据。程序地理编码的地址(n = 15,285)在空间上与邻里和人口普查区域相连。计算猫的人均摄入量和死亡数,并将其与人类人口统计和死亡数据进行比较。使用Poisson混合效应模型来平滑死亡率并计算相对风险。结果-地理编码记录的数据表明,猫的摄入和死亡的年率差异很大(0.85至10.3猫/ 1,000人和0.27至3.9猫/ 1,000人,分别位于波士顿的16个社区中。包含这些社区的156个人口普查区之间的差距甚至更大(进出和死亡人数分别为0.10至22.1猫/ 1,000人和0.15至6.47猫/ 1,000人)。在邻里级别,猫的死亡与人类过早死亡显着相关(R-2 = 0.77)。总体而言,全市猫的人均住所相关的年平均死亡率(估计为每千人2.6只猫)与其他先进社区的死亡率相似。结论和临床意义通过使用地理空间技术,从14至40在波士顿附近和人口普查区,猫的死亡呈倍数梯度变化。猫的死亡与人类过早死亡和反映贫困的社会经济指标有关。有针对性的干预措施可能可以有效解决这些差距。 (Am J Vet Res 2010; 71:161-168)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号