...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >Invited Commentary: History of Place, Life Course, and Health Inequalities-Historical Geographic Information Systems and Epidemiologic Research
【24h】

Invited Commentary: History of Place, Life Course, and Health Inequalities-Historical Geographic Information Systems and Epidemiologic Research

机译:特邀评论:地点,生活历程和健康不平等的历史-历史地理信息系统和流行病学研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years, a large number of studies have investigated the sociogeographical arrangements of health-related characteristics across urban areas. Drawing on theories of "environmental justice," researchers have been concerned with whether there is a social gradient in the spatial distribution of environmental "goods" and "bads." The accompanying article by King and Clarke (Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(1):17-25) makes an important entry into these debates, as it describes the results of the first national-level US study to examine the relationship between urban form (particularly neighborhood walkability) and various area-level sociodemographic measures. Like many studies in this field, King and Clarke's work was constrained by the availability of certain area-level measures, and they had to rely on data from only a single point in time (2000-2001). For this reason, their results can provide few insights into the processes leading to the geographical arrangement of health-related resources across US cities. The emerging field of "historical geographic information systems" offers possibilities to researchers interested in relationships between place and health. Integrating spatial data from various historical sources can enable the reconstruction of past urban environments. These spatial data, accrued over time and appended with detailed cohort information, will offer analytical opportunities for better understanding how place-based factors influence health and well-being over the life course.
机译:近年来,大量研究调查了整个城市地区与健康相关的特征的社会地理分布。借助“环境正义”的理论,研究人员一直在关注环境“商品”和“不良”的空间分布是否存在社会梯度。金和克拉克(Am J Epidemiol。2015; 181(1):17-25)的随附文章为这些辩论提供了重要的参考,因为它描述了美国第一项研究城市与城市之间关系的国家级研究的结果。形式(尤其是邻里可步行性)和各种地区级的社会人口统计学指标。像该领域的许多研究一样,金和克拉克的工作受到某些地区层面措施的限制,他们只能依靠单个时间点(2000-2001年)的数据。因此,他们的研究结果对导致整个美国城市中与健康相关的资源进行地理排列的过程提供了很少的见识。 “历史地理信息系统”的新兴领域为对场所与健康之间的关系感兴趣的研究人员提供了可能性。整合来自各种历史来源的空间数据可以实现对过去城市环境的重建。这些随着时间推移而累积的空间数据,并附有详细的同类群组信息,将提供分析机会,以更好地了解基于地点的因素如何影响一生的健康和福祉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号