...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >Jokela responds to 'repeated measures and effect identification'.
【24h】

Jokela responds to 'repeated measures and effect identification'.

机译:乔科拉回应“重复措施和效果识别”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Research on neighborhood effects faces enormous methodological challenges, with selection bias being near the top of the list. In this issue of the Journal (Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(8):776-784), Professor Jokela addresses this issue with novel repeated measures data and models that decompose putative effects into those within and between persons. His contribution shows that within-person neighborhood effects are quite modest and that there is evidence of selection bias between persons. Like all research, the work rests on assumptions. Unfortunately, such assumptions are difficult to substantiate or validate in this context. A consequentialist epidemiologic perspective compels further innovation and a larger social epidemiologic imagination.
机译:关于邻里效应的研究面临着巨大的方法论挑战,选择偏见位居榜首。在本期《期刊》(Am J Epidemiol。2014; 180(8):776-784)中,乔克拉教授用新颖的重复测量数据和模型解决了这个问题,这些数据和模型将推定的影响分解为人内和人之间的影响。他的贡献表明人与人之间的邻里效应相当适度,并且有证据表明人与人之间存在选择偏见。像所有研究一样,这项工作也基于假设。不幸的是,在这种情况下很难证实或验证这样的假设。因果主义的流行病学观点迫使人们进一步创新和扩大社会流行病学想象力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号