首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >Comparing 3 dietary pattern methods--cluster analysis, factor analysis, and index analysis--With colorectal cancer risk: The NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.
【24h】

Comparing 3 dietary pattern methods--cluster analysis, factor analysis, and index analysis--With colorectal cancer risk: The NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.

机译:比较3种饮食模式方法-群体分析,因子分析和指数分析-结直肠癌风险:NIH-AARP饮食与健康研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The authors compared dietary pattern methods-cluster analysis, factor analysis, and index analysis-with colorectal cancer risk in the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-AARP Diet and Health Study (n = 492,306). Data from a 124-item food frequency questionnaire (1995-1996) were used to identify 4 clusters for men (3 clusters for women), 3 factors, and 4 indexes. Comparisons were made with adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence intervals, distributions of individuals in clusters by quintile of factor and index scores, and health behavior characteristics. During 5 years of follow-up through 2000, 3,110 colorectal cancer cases were ascertained. In men, the vegetables and fruits cluster, the fruits and vegetables factor, the fat-reduced/diet foods factor, and all indexes were associated with reduced risk; the meat and potatoes factor was associated with increased risk. In women, reduced risk was found with the Healthy Eating Index-2005 and increased risk with the meat and potatoes factor. For men, beneficial health characteristics were seen with all fruit/vegetable patterns, diet foods patterns, and indexes, while poorer health characteristics were found with meat patterns. For women, findings were similar except that poorer health characteristics were seen with diet foods patterns. Similarities were found across methods, suggesting basic qualities of healthy diets. Nonetheless, findings vary because each method answers a different question.
机译:作者在美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)-AARP饮食与健康研究(n = 492,306)中比较了饮食模式方法(聚类分析,因子分析和指数分析)与结直肠癌的风险。使用来自124个项目的食物频率调查问卷(1995-1996年)的数据来识别男性的4个类别(女性的3个类别),3个因素和4个指标。通过调整后的相对风险和95%的置信区间进行比较,按因子和指数得分的五分位数对群体中的个体分布以及健康行为特征进行比较。在2000年的5年随访期间,确定了3,110例大肠癌病例。在男性中,蔬菜和水果的聚集,水果和蔬菜的因素,减少脂肪/饮食的食物的因素以及所有指标均与降低的风险有关。肉和土豆因素与增加的风险有关。在女性中,2005年健康饮食指数降低了风险,而肉类和马铃薯因素则增加了风险。对于男性,所有水果/蔬菜模式,减肥食品模式和指标均显示出有益的健康特征,而肉类则发现较差的健康特征。对于女性而言,发现相似,但饮食食物类型的健康特征较差。各种方法之间都存在相似之处,表明健康饮食的基本品质。但是,发现有所不同,因为每种方法都回答了一个不同的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号