首页> 外文期刊>American journal of therapeutics >A Randomized, Comparative, Multicentric Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Zileuton Extended-Release Tablets With Montelukast Sodium Tablets in Patients Suffering From Chronic Persistent Asthma
【24h】

A Randomized, Comparative, Multicentric Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Zileuton Extended-Release Tablets With Montelukast Sodium Tablets in Patients Suffering From Chronic Persistent Asthma

机译:评估齐留通缓释片与孟鲁司特钠片对慢性持续性哮喘患者的疗效和安全性的随机,比较,多中心临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AB Leukotriene (LT) modifiers are anti-inflammatory drugs that are useful as an add-on therapy with first-line asthma-controller medications. This group includes LT synthesis inhibitors (eg, Zileuton) and receptor antagonists (eg, Montelukast), whose direct comparative clinical data are not available. This study was conducted to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of orally administered Zileuton extended-release (ER) with Montelukast sodium in patients suffering from chronic persistent asthma. Patients of 18-65 years of age with mild to moderate chronic stable asthma were randomized to treatment with Zileuton ER 2400 mg/d or Montelukast 10 mg/d for 12 weeks. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and asthma symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness, and shortness of breath each on a 4-point scale) were assessed on monthly scheduled out-patient visits. Safety assessments by clinical and laboratory parameters were carried out during the course of the study. Among 210 patients eligible for efficacy assessment, PEFR improved by 64.8 +/- 52.8 (95% confidence interval: 54.8-74.7) L/min with Zileuton ER (n = 109) and 40.6 +/- 47.5 (31.3-49.9) L/min with Montelukast (n = 101; P < 0.001), whereas percent improvements were 27.0% (22.6%-31.5%) versus 18.4% (14.1%-22.7%), respectively (P = 0.006). Zileuton ER lead to >=12% PEFR improvements in 74 of 109 [67.9% (59.1%-76.7%)] patients, whereas the same was noted in 52 of 101 [51.5% (41.7%-61.2%)] patients receiving Montelukast (P = 0.015). The reduction in the mean overall symptom intensity score was also significantly better with Zileuton ER [-5.0 +/- 2.1 (4.6-5.4) versus -4.2 +/- 2.3 (3.8-4.7)] (P = 0.018); however, the same was not observed for the decline in the individual symptom scores. A lesser but not significantly different adverse event rate was reported in the Zileuton ER group than the Montelukast group with the commonest events being headache and gastrointestinal effects in both the groups. Thus, Zileuton ER seems to be more efficacious than Montelukast and well tolerated for the treatment of mild to moderate chronic persistent asthma in adult patient population. Further studies can elucidate the comparative treatment benefits of these LT modifiers in asthma management.
机译:AB白三烯(LT)调节剂是抗炎药,可用作一线哮喘控制药物的附加疗法。该组包括尚无法获得直接比较临床数据的LT合成抑制剂(例如Zileuton)和受体拮抗剂(例如Montelukast)。进行这项研究以评估口服孟鲁司特钠口服齐留通缓释(ER)对慢性持续性哮喘患者的比较疗效和安全性。 18-65岁患有轻度至中度慢性稳定哮喘的患者被随机分配接受Zileuton ER 2400 mg / d或Montelukast 10 mg / d治疗12周。在每月计划的门诊就诊时评估呼气峰值流速(PEFR)和哮喘症状(咳嗽,喘息,胸闷和呼吸急促,每项4分制)。在研究过程中,通过临床和实验室参数进行了安全性评估。在210例符合疗效评估的患者中,使用Zileuton ER(n = 109)和40.6 +/- 47.5(31.3-49.9)L / min,PEFR改善了64.8 +/- 52.8 L / min(95%置信区间:54.8-74.7)L / min。孟鲁司特的治疗时间(n = 101; P <0.001),而改善百分比分别为27.0%(22.6%-31.5%)和18.4%(14.1%-22.7%)(P = 0.006)。 Zileuton ER导致109例患者[74.6%(59.1%-76.7%)]中的74例PEFR改善> = 12%,而101例接受孟鲁司特[51.5%(41.7%-61.2%)]的患者中有52例同样如此(P = 0.015)。 Zileuton ER的平均总症状强度评分的降低也明显好于[-5.0 +/- 2.1(4.6-5.4),而-4.2 +/- 2.3(3.8-4.7)](P = 0.018);但是,对于单个症状评分的下降,没有发现同样的情况。 Zileuton ER组的不良事件发生率较Montelukast组低,但差异不显着,两组中最常见的事件是头痛和胃肠道疾病。因此,Zileuton ER似乎比Montelukast更有效,并且对于成人患者中的轻度至中度慢性持续性哮喘的治疗耐受性良好。进一步的研究可以阐明这些LT修饰剂在哮喘治疗中的相对治疗优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号