...
首页> 外文期刊>Aging clinical and experimental research >Efficacy and safety of insulin lispro in geriatric patients with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective analysis of seven randomized controlled clinical trials
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of insulin lispro in geriatric patients with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective analysis of seven randomized controlled clinical trials

机译:赖脯胰岛素在老年2型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性:七项随机对照临床试验的回顾性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Aims: Glycemic control in geriatric patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) remains clinically challenging. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of insulin lispro in patients ≥65 years (geriatric) to those 65 years (non-geriatric), using a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of predefined endpoints from an integrated database of seven RCTs of T2DM patients treated with insulin lispro. The primary efficacy measure tested the non-inferiority of insulin lispro (geriatric vs. non-geriatric; non-inferiority margin 0.4%) in terms of hemoglobin A1c (HbA 1c) change from baseline to Month 3 (N = 1,525), with change from baseline to Month 6 as a supportive analysis (N = 885). Changes in HbA 1c from baseline were evaluated with an analysis of covariance model. Secondary measures included incidence and rate of hypoglycemia, and incidence of cardiovascular events. Results: Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to Month 3 was similar for geriatric (-0.97%) and non-geriatric patients (-1.05%); least-square (LS) mean difference (95% CI) was 0.02% (-0.11, 0.15%; p = 0.756). Similar results were observed in patients treated up to Month 6; LS mean difference (95% CI) was 0.07% (-0.12, 0.26%; p = 0.490). Decrease in HbA 1c from baseline to Months 3 and 6 was non-inferior in geriatric compared with non-geriatric patients. There were no significant differences in the incidence and the rate of hypoglycemia, incidence of cardiovascular events, or other serious adverse events including malignancy, post-baseline between the two cohorts. Conclusion: Key measures of efficacy and safety in geriatric patients with T2DM were not significantly different from non-geriatric patients when utilizing insulin lispro. Insulin lispro may be considered a safe and efficacious therapeutic option for the management of T2DM in geriatric patients.
机译:背景与目的:老年2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的血糖控制仍然在临床上具有挑战性。这项研究的目的是使用随机对照临床试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析,比较lispro胰岛素在65岁以上(老年)和65岁以下(非老年)患者的安全性和有效性。方法:这是对来自使用赖脯胰岛素治疗的T2DM患者的7个RCT的集成数据库的预定义终点的回顾性分析。主要功效指标测试了从基线到第3个月血红蛋白A1c(HbA 1c)的变化,赖脯胰岛素的非劣效性(老年性vs.非老年性;非劣质性裕度0.4%)。从基线到第6个月作为支持性分析(N = 885)。 HbA 1c与基线相比的变化通过协方差模型分析进行评估。次要指标包括低血糖的发生率和发生率,以及心血管事件的发生率。结果:老年患者(-0.97%)和非老年患者(-1.05%)从基线到第3个月HbA1c的平均变化相似。最小二乘(LS)平均差异(95%CI)为0.02%(-0.11,0.15%; p = 0.756)。直至第6个月接受治疗的患者观察到相似的结果; LS平均差异(95%CI)为0.07%(-0.12,0.26%; p = 0.490)。与非老年患者相比,从基线到第3和第6个月HbA 1c的降低在老年患者中不逊色。在这两个队列之间,低血糖的发生率和比率,心血管事件或其他严重不良事件(包括恶性肿瘤,基线后)的发生率无显着差异。结论:使用赖脯胰岛素治疗老年T2DM患者的疗效和安全性的关键指标与非老年患者没有显着差异。赖脯胰岛素可以被认为是老年患者T2DM管理的安全有效的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号