首页> 外文期刊>Aging clinical and experimental research >Horizontal and vertical targeting: a population-based comparison of public eldercare services in urban and rural areas of Sweden
【24h】

Horizontal and vertical targeting: a population-based comparison of public eldercare services in urban and rural areas of Sweden

机译:横向和纵向定位:瑞典城市和农村地区基于人口的公共养老服务比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The concepts of target efficiency can be used to assess the extent to which service provision is in line with the needs of the population. Horizontal target efficiency denotes the extent to which those deemed to need a service receive it and vertical target efficiency is the corresponding extent to which those who receive services actually need them. The aim of this study was to assess the target efficiency of the Swedish eldercare system and to establish whether target efficiencies differ in different geographical areas such as large urban, midsize urban and rural areas. Vertical efficiency was measured by studying those people who received eldercare services and was expressed as a percentage of those who received services who were functionally dependent. To measure horizontal target efficiency, data collected at baseline in the longitudinal population study SNAC (Swedish National study on Aging and Care) during the years 2001-2004 were used. The horizontal efficiency was calculated as the percentage of functionally dependent persons who received services. Functional dependency was measured as having difficulty with instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and/or personal activities of daily living (PADL). Services included long-term municipal eldercare services (LTC). Horizontal target efficiency for the public LTC system was reasonably high in all three geographical areas, when using dependency in PADL as the measure of need (70-90 %), but efficiency was lower when the less restrictive measure of IADL dependency was used (40-50 %). In both cases, the target efficiency was markedly higher in the large urban and the rural areas than in the midsize urban areas. Vertical target efficiency showed the same pattern-it was almost 100 % in all areas for IADL dependency, but only 50-60 % for PADL dependency. Household composition differed in the areas studied as did the way public long-term care was provided to people living alone as compared to those co-habiting.
机译:目标效率的概念可用于评估提供的服务符合人群需求的程度。水平目标效率表示被认为需要服务的人获得服务的程度,垂直目标效率是接收服务的人实际需要服务的程度。这项研究的目的是评估瑞典老年人护理系统的目标效率,并确定目标效率在不同的地理区域(例如大城市,中型城市和农村地区)是否不同。通过研究那些接受养老服务的人来衡量垂直效率,并以接受服务的人的百分比来表示。为了衡量水平目标效率,使用了2001-2004年纵向人口研究SNAC(瑞典国家老龄与护理研究)中基线收集的数据。横向效率以接受服务的功能相关人员的百分比计算。功能依赖性被认为是在日常生活中的工具活动(IADL)和/或日常生活中的个人活动(PADL)有困难。服务包括长期市政老年人护理服务(LTC)。当使用PADL中的依赖性作为需求量度时,公共LTC系统的水平目标效率在所有三个地理区域中都相当高(70-90%),但是当使用IADL依赖性较少的量度时,效率较低。(40 -50%)。在这两种情况下,大城市和农村地区的目标效率均明显高于中型城市地区。垂直目标效率显示出相同的模式-在所有领域中,对于IADL依赖性几乎为100%,但对于PADL依赖性仅为50-60%。与同居者相比,所研究领域的家庭组成有所不同,向独居者提供公共长期护理的方式也有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号