首页> 外文期刊>Ортопедця Травматологця ц протезцрования >A comparison of patient reported outcomes between total knee arthroplasty patients receiving the journey II bi-cruciate stabilizing knee system and total hip arthroplasty patients
【24h】

A comparison of patient reported outcomes between total knee arthroplasty patients receiving the journey II bi-cruciate stabilizing knee system and total hip arthroplasty patients

机译:患者报告的膝关节关节型患者患者的患者的比较II双十字架稳定膝关节系统和总髋关节成形术患者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasties (THA) tend to report greater satisfaction than those who underwent total knee arthroplasties (TKA). Progress in TKA and THA procedures requires maximizing perceived patient satisfaction, joint-specific and overall function, as well as the return to previously enjoyed physical activities. Dissatisfaction persists in 11-20 % of primary TKA patients while THA dissatisfaction remains low. This study examined if the use of the journey II bi-cruciate stabilizing (JIIBCS) knee implant (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) in TKA patients improved patient satisfaction to equal those reported by equivalent THA patients. Methods: this retrospective analysis matched 48 JIIBCS TKA and 48 THA patients to compare satisfaction at 3 months and 1 year post-operatively. Patient UCLA, and EQ-5D scores were also compared between the JIIBCS TKA and THA. Results: An independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, showed no difference in outcomes between 96 JIIBCS TKA and THA procedures. Demographics, gender, ASA score, comorbidity and diagnosis were found to be equivalent between groups. There was no statistical significance between JIIBCS TKA and THA patient satisfaction scores at either 3 months (p = 0.398), or one year post-operatively (p = 0.590). The JIIBCS group experienced higher UCLA scores than the THA group at both 3 months (p = 0.028) and 1 year post-operatively (p < 0.001). At 3 months post-operatively, the JIIBCS TKA patients reported superior EQ-5D scores (p < 0.001), but there was no statistically significant difference betM>een groups in EQ-5D scores at one post-operatively, nor in the time taken to return to work, sports, or activities of daily living. Discussion: This retrospective review demonstrated that TKA patients receiving an optimized knee implant experienced non-inferior outcomes and satisfaction compared with clinically similar THA patients.
机译:经过髋关节关节血管成型(THA)的患者倾向于报告比膝关节关节型患者(TKA)的人更大的满足感。 TKA和THA程序的进展需要最大化感知患者满意度,联合特定和整体功能,以及返回以前享有的体育活动。不满在11-20%的初级TKA患者中持续存在,而不满仍然低。本研究审查了TKA患者在TKA患者中使用旅程II双轮滑稳定(JIIBCS)膝盖膝关节(JIIBCS)膝关节(史密斯&侄子,TN,美国孟菲斯,TN,美国),以改善患者满意度,以等同于当量的患者报告的患者。方法:该回顾性分析匹配48 jiibcs tka和48例患者,可操作地比较3个月和1年的满意度。在JIIBCS TKA和THA之间也比较了患者的UCLA和EQ-5D评分。结果:独立样品T检验或Mann-Whitney U试验,在96 jiibcs tka和Tha程序之间没有显示结果。发现人口统计学,性别,ASA得分,合并症和诊断是相当于组之间的等同性。 JIIBCS TKA和THA患者满意度在3个月内(P = 0.398)或一次性一年(P = 0.590)之间没有统计学意义(P = 0.590)。 JIIBCS组在3个月(P = 0.028)和可操作后1年(P <0.001)的3个月内比THA组更高的UCLA分数术后3个月,JIIBCS TKA患者报告了卓越的EQ-5D评分(P <0.001),但在可操作性地的EQ-5D分数中没有统计学上显着的差异β> EEN组,也不存在于所花费的时间内返回工作,体育或日常生活活动。讨论:此回顾性审查证明,与临床相似的THA患者相比,接受优化的膝关节植入物的TKA患者经历了非劣质结果和满足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号