首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The official journal of the National Kidney Foundation >Thematic synthesis of qualitative studies on patient and caregiver perspectives on end-of-life care in CKD
【24h】

Thematic synthesis of qualitative studies on patient and caregiver perspectives on end-of-life care in CKD

机译:CKD临终关怀患者和护理人员观点定性研究的主题综合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Although dialysis prolongs life for patients with end-stage kidney disease, 20% of deaths in this population are preceded by dialysis therapy withdrawal. Recently, there has been more focus on conservative (nondialytic) care as a legitimate option, particularly for elderly patients. This study aims to describe patients' and caregivers' perspectives on conservative treatment and end-of-life care in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Study Design Systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Setting & Population Patients with CKD and caregivers. Search Strategy & Sources MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and reference lists were searched to May 2013. Analytical Approach Thematic synthesis was used to analyze the findings. Results 26 studies involving more than 711 patients (non-dialysis dependent [n = 41], hemodialysis [n = 544], peritoneal dialysis [n = 9]; unspecified dialysis modality [n = 31], conservative management [n = 86]) and 178 caregivers were included. We identified 5 themes: invasive suffering (bodily deterioration, loss of freedom and independence, unyielding fatigue and pain, resignation, treatment burden and harm, financial strain), personal vulnerability (imminence of death, misunderstanding and judgment, autonomy and dignity, medical abandonment, trust and safety), relational responsibility (being a burden, demonstrating loyalty, protecting others from grief), negotiating existential tensions (accepting natural course of life, disrupted aging, worthlessness, living on borrowed time, respecting sanctity of life, life satisfaction, preserving self-identity), and preparedness (decisional clarity, informational power, spirituality and hope). Limitations Non-English articles were excluded; therefore, the transferability of findings to other populations is unclear. Conclusions Some patients with CKD experience physical and psychosocial frailty and feel ambivalent about prolonging life. Some caregivers believe in providing relief from suffering, but are uncertain about making decisions regarding dialysis therapy initiation and discontinuation. We suggest that CKD management should encompass palliative care strategies that promote emotional resilience, sense of well-being, and self-value. Also, respectful and attentive communication may empower patients to convey their values and preferences about their own care.
机译:背景技术尽管透析可延长终末期肾脏疾病患者的寿命,但在该人群中有20%的死亡是在撤消透析治疗之前。最近,人们越来越重视保守治疗(非透析治疗),将其作为一种合理的选择,特别是对于老年患者。这项研究旨在描述患者和护理人员对慢性肾脏病(CKD)的保守治疗和临终护理的观点。研究设计系统审查和定性研究的主题综合。设置和人群CKD患者和护理人员。搜索策略和来源MEDLINE,Embase,PsycINFO,CINAHL和参考文献列表进行了搜索,直到2013年5月。分析方法主题综合用于分析结果。结果26项研究涉及711例患者(非透析相关[n = 41],血液透析[n = 544],腹膜透析[n = 9];未指定的透析方式[n = 31],保守治疗[n = 86]) )和178名照顾者。我们确定了5个主题:侵入性痛苦(身体恶化,丧失自由和独立性,顽强的疲劳和痛苦,辞职,治疗负担和伤害,财务压力),人身脆弱性(即将死亡,误解和判断,自主权和尊严,医疗遗弃) ,信任和安全),关系责任(成为负担,表现出忠诚度,保护他人免受痛苦),协商存在的紧张关系(接受自然的生活历程,破坏衰老,一文不值,靠借来的时间生活,尊重生活的神圣性,生活满意度,保持自我认同)和准备(决策清晰,信息力量,灵性和希望)。限制排除非英语文章;因此,研究结果是否可以转移到其他人群还不清楚。结论一些CKD患者经历了身体和心理上的虚弱,并且对延长寿命感到矛盾。一些护理人员相信可以减轻痛苦,但不确定做出有关透析治疗开始和终止的决定。我们建议,CKD管理应包括姑息治疗策略,以提高情绪弹性,幸福感和自我价值。同样,尊重和细心的沟通可以使患者表达自己对自己的护理的价值观和偏爱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号