首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The official journal of the National Kidney Foundation >Associations of dialysis modality and infectious mortality in incident dialysis patients in Australia and New Zealand.
【24h】

Associations of dialysis modality and infectious mortality in incident dialysis patients in Australia and New Zealand.

机译:澳大利亚和新西兰的透析患者的透析方式与感染死亡率的关联。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present investigation is to compare rates, types, causes, and timing of infectious death in incident peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients in Australia and New Zealand. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study using the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry data. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: The study included all patients starting dialysis therapy between April 1, 1995, and December 31, 2005. PREDICTOR: Dialysis modality. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Rates of and time to infectious death were compared by using Poisson regression, Kaplan-Meier, and competing risks multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analyses. RESULTS: 21,935 patients started dialysis therapy (first treatment PD, n = 6,020; HD, n = 15,915) during the study period, and 1,163 patients (5.1%) died of infectious causes (PD, 529 patients; 7.6% versus HD, 634 patients; 4.2%). Incidence rates of infectious mortality in PD and HD patients were 2.8 and 1.7/100 patient-years, respectively (incidence rate ratio PD versus HD, 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47 to 1.86). After performing competing risks multivariate Cox analyses allowing for an interaction between time on study and modality because of identified nonproportionality of hazards, PD consistently was associated with increased hazard of death from infection compared with HD after 6 months of treatment (<6 months hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.54; 6 months to 2 years HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.59; 2 to 6 years HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.80; >6 years HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.76 to 4.33). This increased risk of infectious death in PD patients was largely accounted for by an increased risk of death caused by bacterial or fungal peritonitis. LIMITATIONS: Patients were not randomly assigned to their initial dialysis modality. Residual confounding and coding bias could not be excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis modality selection significantly influences risks, types, causes, and timing of fatal infections experienced by patients with end-stage kidney disease in Australia and New Zealand.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是比较澳大利亚和新西兰的腹膜透析(PD)和血液透析(HD)患者感染死亡的比率,类型,原因和时机。研究设计:观察性队列研究,使用澳大利亚和新西兰的透析和移植注册数据。地点和参与者:该研究包括所有在1995年4月1日至2005年12月31日期间开始进行透析治疗的患者。预测者:透析方式。结果与测量:使用泊松回归,Kaplan-Meier和竞争风险多元Cox比例风险模型分析,比较了传染性死亡的发生率和发生时间。结果:在研究期间,共有21,935例患者开始透析治疗(首次治疗PD,n = 6,020; HD,n = 15,915),有1,163例患者(5.1%)死于传染病(PD,529例患者; 7.6%vs HD,634例)患者; 4.2%)。 PD和HD患者的传染性死亡发生率分别为2.8和1.7 / 100患者年(PD与HD的发生率之比为1.66; 95%置信区间[CI]为1.47至1.86)。在进行竞争性风险多变量Cox分析后,由于确定的危险性不成比例,使得研究时间和治疗方式之间具有相互作用,与治疗6个月后的HD相比,PD始终与感染致死的危险性增加相关(<6个月危险比[ HR],1.08; 95%CI,0.76至1.54; 6个月至2年HR,1.31; 95%CI,1.09至1.59; 2至6年HR,1.51; 95%CI,1.26至1.80;> 6年HR ,2.76; 95%CI,1.76至4.33)。 PD患者感染性死亡的风险增加主要是由细菌性或真菌性腹膜炎引起的死亡风险增加所致。局限性:患者没有被随机分配到他们最初的透析方式。不能排除残留的混淆和编码偏差。结论:透析方式的选择会极大地影响澳大利亚和新西兰终末期肾脏疾病患者经历致命性感染的风险,类型,原因和时机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号