...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiorenal medicine >Dialysis Modality and Mortality in Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study of Incident Dialysis Patients
【24h】

Dialysis Modality and Mortality in Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study of Incident Dialysis Patients

机译:心力衰竭的透析方式和死亡率:事件透析患者的回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction: Prior studies reported lower mortality with hemodialysis (HD) compared to peritoneal dialysis (PD) in patients with heart failure (HF). We examined mortality rate by initial dialysis modality in incident dialysis patients with a history of HF using contemporary data and methods that ensure comparable HD and PD groups. Methods: Retrospective cohort study using administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. Adults (age 50–80) with a history of HF who initiated maintenance dialysis between April 1, 2007 and March 31, 2016 were included. We excluded patients typically ineligible for PD as an initial modality (dialysis start in hospital, dementia, long-term care facility residency). We determined the cause-specific hazard ratio (transplant as a competing event) between initial dialysis modality (HD vs. PD) and all-cause mortality using an intention-to-treat approach. Results: We included 2,199 patients with HF who initiated maintenance dialysis (77% HD and 23% PD). There were 1,152 (67.8%) and 340 (68.1%) mortality events over a median follow-up of 2.4 and 2.5 years in the HD and PD groups, respectively. Patients initiating HD versus PD was not associated with the mortality rate (adjusted hazard ratio 1.0, 95% CI 0.9–1.1). Similar results were seen in analyses censoring at modality switches and treating modality as time-varying. Conclusions: We found no difference in mortality by initial dialysis modality. Our data support the current practice of selecting dialysis modality based on patient preference for patients with pre-existing HF.
机译:导言:之前的研究表明,心力衰竭(HF)患者血液透析(HD)的死亡率低于腹膜透析(PD)。我们使用当代数据和方法,通过初始透析方式,对有心衰病史的偶发性透析患者的死亡率进行了检查,以确保HD和PD组具有可比性。方法:使用加拿大安大略省的行政数据库进行回顾性队列研究。包括2007年4月1日至2016年3月31日期间开始维持性透析的有心衰病史的成年人(50-80岁)。我们排除了通常不符合PD初始模式的患者(在医院开始透析、痴呆症、长期护理机构住院)。我们采用意向性治疗方法确定了初始透析模式(HD与PD)与全因死亡率之间的原因特异性风险比(移植作为竞争事件)。结果:我们包括2199名开始维持性透析的心衰患者(77%HD和23%PD)。在HD组和PD组的中位随访时间分别为2.4年和2.5年,分别有1152例(67.8%)和340例(68.1%)死亡事件。开始HD与PD的患者与死亡率无关(校正危险比1.0,95%可信区间0.9–1.1)。类似的结果也出现在对模态切换进行审查并将模态视为时变的分析中。结论:我们发现初次透析的死亡率没有差异。我们的数据支持当前的做法,即根据患者对已有心衰患者的偏好选择透析方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号