首页> 外文期刊>Allergology international: official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology >The Clinical Evaluation of the Acceptance of Fluticasone Propionate Diskus~R by Older Japanese Patients with Bronchial Asthma
【24h】

The Clinical Evaluation of the Acceptance of Fluticasone Propionate Diskus~R by Older Japanese Patients with Bronchial Asthma

机译:日本老年支气管哮喘患者接受丙酸氟替卡松磁盘治疗的临床评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Fluticasone propionate (FP) Diskus? is generally regarded as an easy to use and efficacious inhaled device. This study clinically evaluated whether its easy handling and inhalation process were affected by the aging factor or not, compared with those of the FP Diskhaler~R and Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP). Methods: Twenty-four elderly patients with stable moderate asthma (12 aged 65-74 years and 12 aged 75 years or older) who were accustomed to using the Diskhaler~R were evaluated by measuring the required time for finishing one-time inhalation with the device, compared with 7 patients aged less than 65. Ten elderly patients (5 aged 65-74 years, and 5 aged 75 years or older), who used the BDP, were also similarly evaluated and compared with 8 patients aged less than 65. All subjects then switched to use with the Diskus? and the required time for finishing one-time inhalation was measured soon after and 2 weeks after the change. The patients' usage impressions were also questioned.Results: The mean required times (seconds) were significantly different between patients aged 75 years or older, and with patients less than 65 years of age ; 45.8(+-)8.1 vs. 31.8(+-)12.3 (p = 0.046) in the BDP group, and 56.8(+-)25.3 vs. 33.3(+-)18.5 (p = 0.047) in the Diskhaler~R, respectively. Soon after changing to the Diskus~R, those times became insignificant in both groups. After 2 weeks, the required time for using the Diskus~R was significantly shortened in all age groups. 50.0% patients in the BDP group and 79.2% in the Diskhaler~R group finally chose the Diskus~R.Conclusions: The FP Diskus~R inhalation was not affected by the aging factor and all patients could quickly get accustomed to using it, suggesting its clinical efficacy for older patients.
机译:背景:丙酸氟替卡松(FP)磁盘?通常被认为是一种易于使用且有效的吸入装置。与FP Diskhaler〜R和倍氯米松二丙酸酯(BDP)相比,该研究从临床上评估了其易于处理和吸入过程是否受到衰老因素的影响。方法:对24位习惯于使用Diskhaler〜R的稳定中度哮喘(12岁65-74岁,12岁75岁或以上)的老年患者进行评估,测量完成一次吸入的所需时间。相比之下,有7名年龄在65岁以下的患者。使用BDP的10名老年患者(5名年龄在65-74岁,5名年龄在75岁或以上)也得到了类似的评估,并与8名年龄在65岁以下的患者进行了比较。然后所有主题都切换为与Diskus一起使用?并在更改后不久和更改后两周测量完成一次吸入所需的时间。结果:75岁以上的患者和65岁以下的患者的平均所需时间(秒)明显不同。 BDP组分别为45.8(+)8.1和31.8(+-)12.3(p = 0.046),而Diskhaler〜R则为56.8(+-)25.3 vs. 33.3(+-)18.5(p = 0.047),分别。更换为Diskus〜R之后不久,这两组时间都变得微不足道了。 2周后,在所有年龄段中,使用Diskus〜R所需的时间都大大缩短了。 BDP组中有50.0%的患者和Diskhaler〜R组中的79.2%的患者最终选择了Diskus〜R。结论:FP Diskus〜R的吸入不受衰老因素的影响,所有患者均可快速习惯使用它。其对老年患者的临床疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号