首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >The Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health in Psychiatry Possible Reasons for the Lack of Implementation
【24h】

The Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health in Psychiatry Possible Reasons for the Lack of Implementation

机译:国际功能,残疾和健康分类在精神病学中的应用实施不力的可能原因

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this article was to examine the application of the Intemational Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) in the field of psychiatry in the last 10 yrs since the ICF was launched. The hypothesis is that the application of the ICF in the field of psychiatry has not been yet much explored. Therefore, the objective of this article was to provide reasons to explain the difficult implementation of the ICF in this field, which in tum, might account for the lack of studies. A literature search was conducted using the terms ICF AND mental illness OR mental disorders OR psychiatry in titles, ABSTRACTs, and key words of articles collected in the databases ISI Web of Knowledge, ScienceDirect and Medline from 2001 to 2010. A total of 64 full-length articles were retrieved and reviewed, and among them, 13 were eventually included in this review because they were related to the ICF in psychiatry. Of the 13 studies identified conceming the ICF and mental disorders, 7 focus on the implementation of the ICF in the clinical practice, and 6 are theoretical papers discussing the potential benefits of the ICF for the field of psychiatry. A number of reasons can be suggested to explain the paucity of studies on the use of the ICF in psychiatry in the last 10 yrs: (1) the novelty of the ICF and the dominance of the medical model, (2) the belief that disability is just about physical conditions, (3) the influence of medication on capacity and performance, (4) the complex structure of the ICF, (5) the intrinsic limitations of the ICF, and (6) limitations in the accessibility of the ICF to some medical professionals.
机译:本文的目的是研究功能,残疾和健康的国际分类(ICF)在ICF推出以来的最近十年中在精神病学领域的应用。假设是,尚未对ICF在精神病学领域的应用进行过深入的研究。因此,本文的目的是提供理由来解释ICF在该领域的难以实施,这可能是造成缺乏研究的原因。从2001年至2010年,在ISI Web of Knowledge,ScienceDirect和Medline数据库中,使用标题,摘要和词的关键词,摘要和关键词对ICF和精神疾病或精神疾病或精神病学进行了文献检索。总共64篇全文检索并审查了篇幅较长的文章,其中最终有13篇文章包含在本篇评论中,因为它们与精神病学中的ICF有关。在13项确定构成ICF和精神障碍的研究中,有7篇关注于临床实践中ICF的实施,而6篇是讨论ICF在精神病学领域的潜在益处的理论论文。可以提出许多原因来解释过去10年中有关在精神病学领域使用ICF的研究不足:(1)ICF的新颖性和医学模型的优势,(2)对残疾的信念只是关于身体状况,(3)药物对容量和性能的影响,(4)ICF的复杂结构,(5)ICF的固有局限性,以及(6)ICF的可及性限制一些医疗专业人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号