...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Preventive Medicine >Making evidence from research more relevant, useful, and actionable in policy, program planning, and practice slips 'twixt cup and lip'.
【24h】

Making evidence from research more relevant, useful, and actionable in policy, program planning, and practice slips 'twixt cup and lip'.

机译:使来自研究的证据在政策,项目计划和实践中更相关,有用和可行,可谓“杯水车薪”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The apparent loss of evidence between production and implementation has become a concern of legislators, research funding agencies, academic institutions, and professional associations alike. Researchers and journal reviewers exacerbate this slippage by emphasizing internal validity, often at the expense of the contextual factors that make science relevant to practice. As illustrated by the papers in this supplement to the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, the contribution to this imbalance from researchers can be offset by their active engagement of the intended users and beneficiaries of the research in applying principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR).
机译:在生产和实施之间明显缺乏证据,已经成为立法者,研究资助机构,学术机构和专业协会的关注焦点。研究人员和期刊审稿人强调内部有效性会加剧这种失误,而这往往是以使科学与实践相关的背景因素为代价的。正如《美国预防医学杂志》增刊中的论文所表明的那样,研究人员对这种不平衡的贡献可以被研究的预期用户和研究受益者在基于社区参与性研究的原则(CBPR)中的积极参与所抵消。 )。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号