首页> 外文学位 >Public policy, occupational pension plans, and alternative retirement savings programs.
【24h】

Public policy, occupational pension plans, and alternative retirement savings programs.

机译:公共政策,职业养老金计划和其他退休储蓄计划。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Last decade witnessed rapid growth of Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSPs) and slow decline of occupational pension plans, particularly the defined-benefit plans. Meanwhile federal Income Tax Act and provincial Pension Standards Legislations have been reformed several times. The trend from traditional defined-benefit plans to more flexible defined contribution plans and group RRSP plans has also spurred interest in its impact on labour market, employment relations, and human resource management. To date, no thorough evaluation has been done on the determinants of pension coverage in Canada. Also, research has neither comprehensively assessed the productivity enhancing features of defined benefit plans nor provided a strong test of their labour market impact in comparison to other deferred compensation arrangements.; Making use of two nationally representative surveys of Canadian workers and workplaces, my program of study is intended to advance the knowledge of current pension industry and fill the above gaps in the pension literature. Major findings are: (1) Public policies, such as higher marginal taxes, earlier vesting, and more permissive eligibility rules are found to increase pension coverage, while a ban on mandatory retirement is found to have a negative yet insignificant effect, consistent with the institutional view of pensions. (2) Pension plan and hybrid plan coverage (both pension and group RRSP coverage) are found to have significant quit reduction effects, and hybrid plan coverage has the strongest impact. Group RRSPs have small, positive effect on employee quit probability. This evidence suggests that implicit contract theory and expected pension capital loss are the major mechanisms as opposed to labour market sorting. (3) Both pensions and group RRSPs are found to have productivity enhancing effects but for different reasons, and hybrid plans have largest positive impact. Productivity gains from pension plans work more through the channels of rigorous employee selection, quit reduction, and employer-sponsored training, in line with the training and shirking models, while productivity gains through group RRSPs are achieved more through layoff deterrence and greater work effort, consistent with the information asymmetric hiring/selection model.
机译:过去十年见证了注册退休储蓄计划(RRSP)的快速增长以及职业养老金计划(特别是定额福利计划)的缓慢下降。同时,联邦所得税法和省级退休金标准法规也进行了多次改革。从传统的设定受益计划到更灵活的设定缴款计划和团体RRSP计划的趋势也激发了人们对其对劳动力市场,就业关系和人力资源管理的影响的兴趣。迄今为止,尚未对加拿大养老金覆盖率的决定因素进行全面评估。此外,研究还没有全面评估既定福利计划的生产率提高功能,也没有提供与其他递延薪酬安排相比对其劳动力市场影响的有力检验。我的学习计划利用对加拿大工人和工作场所的两次全国代表性调查,旨在增进当前养老金行业的知识,并填补养老金文献中的上述空白。主要发现是:(1)发现提高边际税率,更早归属和更宽松的资格规则等公共政策可增加养老金覆盖率,而强制性退休禁令被认为具有消极影响却微不足道,与政策规定一致。养老金的制度观点。 (2)养老金计划和混合计划的覆盖范围(养老金和团体RRSP覆盖范围)被发现具有显着的戒烟效果,并且混合计划的覆盖范围影响最大。团体RRSP对员工辞职概率的影响很小,也很积极。该证据表明,与劳动力市场分类相反,隐性合同理论和预期的养老金资本损失是主要机制。 (3)养老金和团体RRSP都具有提高生产率的作用,但是出于不同的原因,混合计划具有最大的积极影响。退休金计划的生产率收益更多地通过严格的员工选拔,辞职减少和雇主赞助的培训渠道来进行,并与培训和逃避模型相一致,而通过团体RRSP获得的生产率收益则更多地通过裁员威慑和更大的工作量来实现,与信息非对称雇用/选择模型一致。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fang, Tony Tao.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 112 p.
  • 总页数 112
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号