首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Preventive Medicine >Natural language processing in the electronic medical record assessing clinician adherence to tobacco treatment guidelines.
【24h】

Natural language processing in the electronic medical record assessing clinician adherence to tobacco treatment guidelines.

机译:电子病历中的自然语言处理可评估临床医生是否遵守烟草治疗准则。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Comprehensively assessing care quality with electronic medical records (EMRs) is not currently possible because much data reside in clinicians' free-text notes. METHODS: We evaluated the accuracy of MediClass, an automated, rule-based classifier of the EMR that incorporates natural language processing, in assessing whether clinicians: (1) asked if the patient smoked; (2) advised them to stop; (3) assessed their readiness to quit; (4) assisted them in quitting by providing information or medications; and (5) arranged for appropriate follow-up care (i.e., the 5A's of smoking-cessation care). DESIGN: We analyzed 125 medical records of known smokers at each of four HMOs in 2003 and 2004. One trained abstractor at each HMO manually coded all 500 records according to whether or not each of the 5A's of smoking cessation care was addressed during routine outpatient visits. MEASUREMENTS: For each patient's record, we compared the presence or absence of each of the 5A's as assessed by each human coder and by MediClass. We measured the chance-corrected agreement between the human raters and MediClass using the kappa statistic. RESULTS: For "ask" and "assist," agreement among human coders was indistinguishable from agreement between humans and MediClass (p>0.05). For "assess" and "advise," the human coders agreed more with each other than they did with MediClass (p<0.01); however, MediClass performance was sufficient to assess quality in these areas. The frequency of "arrange" was too low to be analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: MediClass performance appears adequate to replace human coders of the 5A's of smoking-cessation care, allowing for automated assessment of clinician adherence to one of the most important, evidence-based guidelines in preventive health care.
机译:背景技术:由于临床医生的自由文本注释中包含大量数据,因此目前无法通过电子病历(EMR)全面评估护理质量。方法:我们评估了MediClass(一种结合自然语言处理的基于规则的EMR自动分类器)在评估临床医生是否准确性方​​面的准确性:(1)询问患者是否吸烟; (2)劝告他们停下来; (3)评估他们是否准备退出; (4)通过提供信息或药物协助他们戒烟; (5)安排适当的后续护理(即5A戒烟护理)。设计:我们分析了2003年和2004年每个HMO的125名已知吸烟者的病历。每个HMO的一名受过训练的摘要员根据常规门诊期间是否对5A戒烟进行了手动编码,对全部500条记录进行了手动编码。测量:对于每个患者的记录,我们比较了每个人类编码员和MediClass评估的5A的存在与否。我们使用kappa统计量度了人类评估者与MediClass之间的机会校正协议。结果:就“询问”和“协助”而言,人类编码员之间的共识与人类与MediClass之间的共识没有区别(p> 0.05)。对于“评估”和“建议”,人类编码员之间的共识比对MediClass的共识更多(p <0.01);但是,MediClass的性能足以评估这些领域的质量。 “安排”的频率太低而无法分析。结论:MediClass的性能似乎足以代替5A戒烟治疗的人类编码员,从而可以自动评估临床医生对预防性保健中最重要的循证指南之一的依从性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号