首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation >Reducing road traffic deaths: where should we focus global health initiatives?
【24h】

Reducing road traffic deaths: where should we focus global health initiatives?

机译:减少道路交通死亡:我们应该在哪里聚焦全球卫生倡议?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundCurrent global surgery initiatives focus on increasing surgical workforce; however, it is unclear whether this approach would be helpful globally, as patients in low-resource countries may not be able to reach hospitals in a timely fashion without formal Emergency Medical Services (EMS). We hypothesize that increased surgical workforce correlates with decreased road traffic deaths (RTDs) only in countries with EMS. MethodsEstimated RTDs were obtained from the Global Status Report on Road Safety 2013, which estimated the RTD rate in 2010 (RTD 2010). The classification of EMS was defined by the Global Status Report on Road Safety 2009. The density of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and obstetricians (SAO density) and 2010 income classification were accessed from the World Bank. Multivariable regression analysis was performed adjusting for different countries, income levels, and trauma system characteristics. Sensitivity analysis was performed. ResultsOne-fourth of the countries reported not having formal EMS (n?=?41, 23.4%). On adjusted analysis, SAO density was not associated with changes in RTD 2010 in countries without EMS (n?=?25,P?=?0.50). However, in countries with EMS, each increase in SAO density per 100,000 population decreased RTDs by 0.079 per 100,000 population (n?=?97,P?<0.001). Income was the only other factor resulting in reduced mortality rates (P?=?0.004). Sensitivity analysis confirmed these findings. ConclusionsIncreases in surgical workforce reduce RTDs only when EMS exist. Surgical workforce and EMS must be seen as part of the same system and developed together to maximize their effect in reducing RTDs. Global health initiatives should be tailored to individual country need. Level of EvidenceLevel II (Ecological study).
机译:背景电流全球外科倡议专注于增加手术劳动力;然而,目前尚不清楚这种方法是否会在全球范围内有所帮助,因为低资源国家的患者可能无法及时到达医院,没有正式的紧急医疗服务(EMS)。我们假设仅在与EMS国家的国家/地区的道路交通死亡(RTDS减少)增加了增加的手术劳动力。 Prafficationated RTDS是从2013年道路安全的全球状况报告获得的RTD,该报告估计2010年的RTD率(RTD 2010)。 EMS的分类是由2009年道路安全的全球状况报告定义。外科医生,麻醉师和产科医生(SAO密度)和2010年收入分类的密度被从世界银行提供。对不同国家,收入水平和创伤系统特征进行了多变量回归分析。进行敏感性分析。报告的国家元素 - 第四个国家没有正式的EMS(n?=?41,23.4%)。在调整后的分析上,SAO密度与没有EMS的国家RTD 2010的变化无关(n?= 25,p?= 0.50)。然而,在EMS的国家,每10万人10万名人口的每增加一个人口度的每增加0.079人口(N?= 97,P?<0.001)。收入是导致死亡率降低的唯一其他因素(p?= 0.004)。敏感性分析证实了这些发现。结论外科劳动力中的缺陷仅在EMS存在时才能减少RTD。手术劳动力和EMS必须被视为相同系统的一部分,并开发在一起,以最大限度地提高其在减少RTD方面的效果。全球卫生倡议应根据个人国家量身定制。 EVIDENCELEVEL II的水平(生态学研究)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号