...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Oncology >Does multicenter care impact the outcomes of surgical patients with gastrointestinal malignancies requiring complex multimodality therapy?
【24h】

Does multicenter care impact the outcomes of surgical patients with gastrointestinal malignancies requiring complex multimodality therapy?

机译:多中心护理会影响外科患者的胃肠道恶性肿瘤的结果是否需要复杂的多层疗法治疗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Regionalization of oncologic care has increased, but less is known whether patient outcomes are influenced by receipt of multimodality care through multicenter care (MCC) or single-center care (SCC). Methods Patients from 2004 to 2015 National Cancer Data Base diagnosed with stage II-III esophageal (EA), stage II-III pancreatic (PA), and stage II-IV rectal (RA) adenocarcinoma who underwent resection at a high volume center (HVC) and required radiation and/or chemotherapy were included. MCC (care at 2+ facilities) and SCC patients were propensity-score matched 1:2 and Cox proportional hazards regression used to analyze survival. Results On multivariable regression analysis, MCC in RA patients (N = 325/2097, 15.5%) was more associated with residing >= 40 miles from the HVC (odds ratio [OR] = 2.37;P = .044) and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (1.42,P = .040). In PA patients (N = 75/380, 19.7%), residing >= 40 miles from the HVC (OR = 3.22;P = .001), and in EA patients (N = 88/534, 16.5%), younger patients (P = .011) were associated with MCC. Following propensity score matching, EA (N = 147), PA (N = 133), and RA (N = 661) patients had no difference in 1-year and 3-year overall survival when comparing MCC to SCC. Conclusions The use of MCC appears safe without a difference in survival and may offer significant advantages in convenience to patients as they undergo their complex oncologic care.
机译:背景技术肿瘤护理的区域化增加,但较少是已知患者结果是通过多中心护理(MCC)或单中心护理(SCC)接收多模护理的影响。方法2004至2015年患者诊断患有阶段II-III食管(EA),第II-III阶段胰腺(PA),和II-IV阶段直肠(RA)腺癌在高批量中心进行切除(HVC )包括所需的辐射和/或化疗。 MCC(护理在2+设施)和SCC患者的倾向分数匹配1:2和Cox比例危害回归用于分析生存率。结果对多变量回归分析,RA患者的MCC(N = 325 / 2017,15.5%)与距离HVC(差距[或] = 2.37; P = .044)以及接收Neoadjuvant的差异> = 40英里更相关化疗(1.42,P = .040)。在PA患者中(n = 75/380,19.7%),距离HVC(或= 3.22; P = .001)居住> = 40英里,在EA患者(n = 88/534,16.5%),较年轻的患者(p = .011)与MCC相关联。在倾向得分匹配之后,EA(n = 147),PA(n = 133)和Ra(n = 661)患者在比较MCC到SCC时,1年和3年整体存活中没有差异。结论使用MCC的使用效果,没有生存差异,可为患者提供显着的优势,因为它们经历复杂的肿瘤护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号