首页> 外文期刊>Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology >Evaluation of legal debt collection services by using Hesitant Pythagorean (Intuitionistic Type 2) fuzzy AHP
【24h】

Evaluation of legal debt collection services by using Hesitant Pythagorean (Intuitionistic Type 2) fuzzy AHP

机译:使用犹豫不决的毕达哥兰(直觉类型2)模糊AHP评估法律债务收集服务

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Managing the collection of unpaid debts is crucial for the financial survival of the companies. The long term unpaid debts are collected through legal debt collection processes. This legal process should be carried out by qualified lawyers. The companies with many subscribers usually work with legal debt collection offices outside the company rather than allocate internal resources for the management of this process. Evaluating the performances of legal debt collection offices and appropriate distribution of the relevant debtor files to different legal debt collection offices located in different regions are very important for optimizing the debt collection. One of the biggest GSM operators in Turkey that has millions of customers wants to enhance its legal debt collection process. Due to the high number of customer, the GSM operator works approximately one hundred legal debt collection offices which makes evaluation complex. This complex evaluation process should be objective, transparent, and represent the company vision and strategy. The legal debt collection offices should not only increase the total amount of collected debts but also avoid creating compliance problems and customer dissatisfaction. The evaluation of legal debt collection offices should involve both of these objective and subjective criteria. Yet, the evaluations involve hesitancy and vagueness. In this study, we use hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets for evaluating the performances of the legal debt collection offices and apply it the real data.
机译:管理未付债务的收集对于公司的财务生存至关重要。通过法律债务收集程序收集长期未付债务。该法律程序应由合格的律师进行。有许多订阅者的公司通常与公司以外的法律债务收集办公室合作,而不是为此进程的管理分配内部资源。评估法律债务收集办公室的表现,以及适当分配相关债务档案到不同地区的不同法律债务收集办公室,对优化债务收集非常重要。土耳其最大的GSM运营商之一,有数百万客户希望加强其法律债务收集过程。由于客户数量大,GSM运营商工作大约一百个法律债务收集办公室,使评估复杂。这种复杂的评估过程应客观,透明,代表公司愿景和战略。法律债务收集办公室不仅应增加收集的债务总额,而且还避免创建合规性问题和客户不满。法律债务收集办公室的评估应涉及这两个目标和主观标准。然而,评估涉及犹豫和模糊性。在这项研究中,我们使用犹豫不决的毕达哥拉斯模糊集来评估法律债务收集办公室的表现,并将其应用于真实数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号