首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology >Trainee research requirements of Australasian medical colleges: How does the Faculty of Radiation Oncology compare?
【24h】

Trainee research requirements of Australasian medical colleges: How does the Faculty of Radiation Oncology compare?

机译:澳大利亚医学院校的实习生研究要求:辐射肿瘤学院如何比较?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Introduction The Faculty of Radiation Oncology ( FRO ) of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists ( RANZCR ) currently allows several pathways for trainees to satisfy its mandatory original research requirement. In practice, the majority need to have a manuscript ‘accepted to peer review’ by one of five specified radiation oncology ( RO ) journals before being eligible to sit for the final examination. The purpose of this work was to determine the corresponding trainee research requirements of the other Australasian medical colleges and compare them with FRO as a companion to a planned FRO trainee survey on the same topic. Methods The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency ( AHPRA ) website lists 16 colleges conferring medical fellowships, four of which have various sub‐faculties, and the New Zealand Medical Council website lists three other separate colleges (69 entities in all). Their individual websites were interrogated to determine and tabulate their respective trainee research requirements. Results 7/69 entities (10%) do not include a research component in their published training programme. Four (5.8%) mandate actual publication of a manuscript (and additionally, FRO does also require this for journals other than the five specified). The other training programmes have less rigorous submission requirements, for example internal assessment of a research report. In addition, many allow attainment of a research higher degree (including FRO ) or multiple other options as an alternative pathway. Eleven entities (including FRO ) stipulate that their requirement needs to be satisfied before sitting for the exit examination. Conclusions The current FRO trainee research requirement is at the more stringent end of the Australasian spectrum. This has advantages and disadvantages for RO trainees and their departments. The data presented here and the trainee survey will inform the RANZCR Training and Assessment Review project, ongoing at the time of writing.
机译:摘要引言澳大利亚皇家和新西兰辐射科学家(Ranzcr)的辐射肿瘤学院(Ranzcr)目前允许若干途径,以满足其强制性原始研究要求。在实践中,在有资格坐在最终审查之前,大多数人需要通过五个特定放射肿瘤学(RO)期刊中的一个人的稿件“同行评审”。这项工作的目的是确定澳大利亚医学院的相应实习生研究要求,并将它们与同一主题上计划的人的培训人员调查的同伴进行比较。方法澳大利亚卫生从业机构(AHPRA)网站列出16所大学赋予医学奖学金,其中四个有各种子学院,新西兰医疗委员会网站列出了另外三所独立大学(全部69个实体)。他们的个人网站被询问以确定和制表其各自的实习研究要求。结果7/69实体(10%)不包括其发布培训计划中的研究成分。四(5.8%)授权稿件的实际出版物(另外,还需要这一点,而不是指定的五个以外的期刊)。其他培训计划具有不太严格的提交要求,例如研究报告的内部评估。此外,许多人允许获得更高程度(包括来自)或多种其他选项作为替代途径的研究。 11个实体(包括fro)规定,在坐在出口检查之前,需要满足他们的要求。结论目前的经税学生研究要求是澳大利亚频谱的更严格的结束。这对RO学员及其部门具有优势和缺点。这里提出的数据和实习生调查将在撰写本文时通知Ranzcr培训和评估审查项目。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号