首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes, obesity & metabolism >Effectiveness of high‐intensity interval training combined with resistance training versus continuous moderate‐intensity training combined with resistance training in patients with type 2 diabetes: A one‐year randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Effectiveness of high‐intensity interval training combined with resistance training versus continuous moderate‐intensity training combined with resistance training in patients with type 2 diabetes: A one‐year randomized controlled trial

机译:高强度间隔训练结合抗性训练的有效性与2型糖尿病患者抗性训练相结合的连续中等强度训练:一年的随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aims To evaluate the impact of one‐year high intensity interval training (HIIT) combined with resistance training (RT) vs continuous moderate intensity training (MCT) combined with RT on glycaemic control, body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods A randomized controlled trial included 96 participants with type 2 diabetes for a one‐year supervised exercise intervention with three groups: Control, HIIT with RT and MCT with RT). The control group received standard counseling regarding general PA guidelines, with no structured exercise sessions. The main outcome variable was HbA1c (%). Secondary outcomes were other glycaemic variables, body composition, anthropometry measurements, CRF and enjoyment of exercise. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to model outcomes. Results Among the 96 participants enrolled in the intervention, 80 were randomized, with a mean (SD) age of 58.5 years (7.7) and a mean HbA1c of 7.2% (1.6). After adjusting the model for sex and total moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (MVPA), we found that both the MCT with RT (β, 0.003; P , 0.921) and the HIIT with RT (β, 0.025; P, 0.385) groups had no effect on HbA1c. A favourable effect was observed in the MCT with RT group, with a reduction in whole body fat index (β, ?0.062; P, 0.022), android fat index (β, ?0.010; P, 0.010) and gynoid fat index (β, ?0.013; P , 0.014). Additionally, CRF increased during the intervention, but only in the MCT with RT group (β, 0.185; P, 0.019). Conclusions The results from this study suggest that there was no effect of either MCT with RT or HIIT with RT on glycaemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. However, the combination of MCT and RT improved body composition and CRF following a one‐year intervention.
机译:旨在评估一年的高强度间隔训练(HIIT)与抗性训练(RT)相结合的影响与型患者血糖对照,身体成分和心肺血液训练(CRF)相结合的连续中等强度训练(MCT)。 2糖尿病。材料和方法随机对照试验包括96名患有2型糖尿病的参与者,为期一年的监督运动干预,三组:对照,HIIT,具有RT和MCT,具有RT)。对照组接受了关于总体PA指南的标准咨询,没有结构性的运动会。主要结果变量是HBA1C(%)。二次结果是其他血糖变量,身体成分,人体测量测量,CRF和运动享受。广义估计方程(GEE)用于模拟结果。结果96人参加干预的参与者,80例随机,平均(SD)年龄为58.5岁(7.7),平均HBA1c为7.2%(1.6)。在调整性别和全部中等剧烈的身体活动(MVPA)的模型后,我们发现使用Rt(β,0.003; p,0.921)和Rt的HIT(β,0.025; p,0.385)群体对HBA1c没有影响。在MCT与RT组中观察到有利的效果,整体体脂指数(β,β062; p,0.022),Android脂肪指数(β,β010; p,0.010)和姜脂肪指数(β ,?0.013; p,0.014)。此外,CRF在干预期间增加,但仅在具有RT组的MCT中(β,0.185; p,0.019)。结论本研究的结果表明,MCT与RT或HIIT的影响没有患有2型糖尿病的个体血糖控制的HIT。然而,在一年干预后,MCT和RT改善的身体成分和CRF的组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号