首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes technology & therapeutics >Observational Registry of Basal Insulin Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in China: Safety and Hypoglycemia Predictors
【24h】

Observational Registry of Basal Insulin Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in China: Safety and Hypoglycemia Predictors

机译:中国2型糖尿病患者基底胰岛素治疗的观察登记:安全和低血糖预测因子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The Observational Registry of Basal Insulin Treatment (ORBIT) study evaluated the safety of basal insulin (BI) in real-world settings in China. Methods: We analyzed 9002 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with oral hypoglycemic agents from 8 geographic regions and 2 hospital tiers in China who initiated and maintained BI treatment. Body weight and hypoglycemic episodes were recorded at baseline and 3 and 6 months. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded at 3 and 6 months. Results: Age, gender, inpatient/outpatient status, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at baseline and at the end of study, T2D duration, microvascular complications, BI type, combination with insulin secretagogues, self-monitoring of blood glucose frequency, and insulin dosage, all predicted hypoglycemia. BI use generally did not induce significant weight gain (0.02kg); weight gain with insulin detemir (-0.30kg) was less than that with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin (0.20kg) or insulin glargine (0.05kg). Overall, general hypoglycemia incidence (5.6% vs. 7.7%) and annual event rate (1.6 vs. 1.8) were similar before and after BI initiation, whereas a slight decrease was noted in severe hypoglycemia incidence (0.6%-0.3%) and frequency (0.05-0.03 events/patient-year). The general hypoglycemia rate was lowest with insulin glargine, whereas there was no significant difference in severe hypoglycemia among the three BI groups. Overall, 3.5% of patients had at least one SAE during the study. Most SAEs were found to be unrelated to BI treatment. Conclusions: Real-world BI use, particularly insulin detemir and glargine, was associated with only slight weight gain and low hypoglycemia risk in patients with T2D in China.
机译:背景:基础胰岛素治疗(轨道)研究的观察注册表评估了中国基础胰岛素(BI)在中国的真实环境中的安全性。方法:通过8个地理区域和2家医院层,分析了9002名糖尿病患者(T2D)的2型糖尿病患者(T2D),来自8名地理区域和2名中国医院层的口服降血糖药物。在基线和3个月和3个月内记录体重和低血糖发作。严重的不良事件(SAES)在3和6个月内记录。结果:年龄,性别,住院病/门诊状态,体重指数,血糖血红蛋白(HBA1c)在基线和在研究结束时,T2D持续时间,微血管并发症,BI型,与胰岛素分泌素组合,自我监测血糖频率,胰岛素剂量,所有预测的低血糖。双用途通常没有诱导显着的体重增加(0.02kg);用胰岛素DECIMIR(-0.30kg)的体重增加小于中性protamine hagedorn(NPH)胰岛素(0.20kg)或胰岛素狼(0.05kg)。总体而言,一般低血糖发病率(5.6%与7.7%)和年事件率(1.6 vs.1.8)在BI启动之前和之后相似,而在严重的低血基血症发生率(0.6%-0.3%)和频率下,则注意到略微减少(0.05-0.03活动/患者年)。一般的低血糖率含有胰岛素狼原症最低,而三个BI组中严重的低血糖症差异无显着差异。总的来说,3.5%的患者在研究期间至少有一个SAE。大多数SAES被发现与BI治疗无关。结论:现实世界BI使用,特别是胰岛素DECIMIR和GLARGIN,在中国T2D患者中只有轻微的体重增加和低低血糖风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号