首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics: The Journal of the International Association for Wind Engineering >Numerical comparison of aerodynamic performance of stationary and moving trains with or without windbreak wall under crosswind
【24h】

Numerical comparison of aerodynamic performance of stationary and moving trains with or without windbreak wall under crosswind

机译:横顺下的防风壁空气动力学性能的数值比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aerodynamic performance of stationary and moving CRH2c trains with or without a windbreak wall under crosswind was simulated by DDES based on the SST kappa-omega turbulence model. In this paper we present a comparison between the pressure on and around the trains, velocity around the trains, and the forces experienced by trains. Our work is an attempt to understand the difference in the aerodynamic performance between stationary and moving trains with or without a windbreak wall under crosswind. In addition, our study aims to determine whether the method applicable to stationary trains could replace that for moving trains. The numerical algorithm used in this simulation is verified by comparing its results with those obtained in a wind tunnel test. The results show that for a train without a windbreak wall under crosswind, the method for stationary trains can replace that for moving trains to simulate the pressure field around and the aerodynamic forces of a train, although the results may be relatively conservative. Furthermore, the aerodynamic forces of the tail car are almost insensitive to the train motion; however, for the simulation of the velocity field around the train, replacement of the method for moving trains by that for stationary trains requires careful consideration. The results showed that, for a train with a windbreak wall under crosswind, the method for moving trains cannot be replaced by that for stationary trains because the new vortices that are produced close to the body of the train by the windbreak wall are significantly affected by the motion of the train.
机译:基于SST kappa-Omega湍流模型,模拟了静止和移动CRH2C训练的空气动力学性能,有或没有防风壁。在本文中,我们在列车上和周围的压力之间进行了比较,列车周围的速度以及列车所经历的力。我们的作品是试图了解静止和移动火车之间的空气动力学性能之间的差异,无论是穿着横向的防风墙。此外,我们的研究旨在确定适用于静止列车的方法是否可以取代移动列车。通过将其结果与在风隧道试验中获得的结果进行比较来验证该模拟中使用的数值算法。结果表明,对于没有穿着风洞壁的跨越式火车,静止列车的方法可以取代移动列车,以模拟火车的压力场和火车的空气动力,尽管结果可能是相对保守的。此外,尾部汽车的空气动力几乎对火车运动不敏感;然而,为了模拟火车周围的速度场,通过为静止列车替换移动列车的方法需要仔细考虑。结果表明,对于横顺下的风洞壁的火车,移动列车的方法不能被用于固定列车所取代,因为靠近火焰墙体的火车体内的靠近的新涡流受到显着影响火车的运动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号