首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Examining Generalizability of Older Adults' Preferences for Discussing Cessation of Screening Colonoscopies in Older Adults with Low Health Literacy
【24h】

Examining Generalizability of Older Adults' Preferences for Discussing Cessation of Screening Colonoscopies in Older Adults with Low Health Literacy

机译:审查老年人的偏好促进讨论较低的卫生素质筛选老年人筛选结肠镜检查的偏好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/ObjectivesMany older adults receive unnecessary screening colonoscopies. We previously conducted a survey using a national online panel to assess older adults' preferences for how clinicians can discuss stopping screening colonoscopies. We sought to assess the generalizability of those results by comparing them to a sample of older adults with low health literacy.DesignCross-sectional survey.SettingBaltimore metropolitan area (low health literacy sample) and a national, probability-based online panel-KnowledgePanel (national sample).ParticipantsAdults 65+ with low health literacy measured using a single-question screen (low health literacy sample, n=113) and KnowledgePanel members 65+ who completed survey about colorectal cancer screening (national sample, n=441).MeasurementsThe same survey was administered to both groups. Using the best-worst scaling method, we assessed relative preferences for 13 different ways to explain stopping screening colonoscopies. We used conditional logistic regression to quantify the relative preference for each explanation, where a higher preference weight indicates stronger preference. We analyzed each sample separately, then compared the two samples using Spearman's correlation coefficient, the likelihood ratio test to assess for overall differences between the two sets of preference weights, and the Wald test to assess differences in preference weights for each individual phrases.ResultsThe responses from the two samples were highly correlated (Spearman's coefficient 0.92, p<0.0001). The most preferred phrase to explain stopping screening colonoscopy was "Your other health issues should take priority" in both groups. The three least preferred options were also the same for both groups, with the least preferred being "The doctor does not give an explanation." The explanation that referred to "quality of life" was more preferred by the low health literacy group whereas explanations that mentioned "unlikely to benefit" and "high risk for harms" were more preferred by the national survey group (all p<0.001).ConclusionAmong two different populations of older adults with different health literacy levels, the preferred strategies for clinicians to discuss stopping screening colonoscopies were highly correlated. Our results can inform effective communication about stopping screening colonoscopies in older adults across different health literacy levels.
机译:背景/玻美灯合年长的成年人收到不必要的筛选结肠镜检查。我们之前使用国家在线小组进行了一项调查,以评估老年人的偏好,临床如何讨论停止筛选结肠镜检查。我们试图通过将它们与具有低健康识字的老年人的样本进​​行比较来评估这些结果的概括性.Designcross分段调查。塞特比亚莫雷大都市(低健康识字样本)和基于概率的在线小组 - 知识专家(国家)样本)。使用单一问题屏幕(低健康识字样品,n = 113)和完成关于结肠直肠癌筛查(National Sample,N = 441)的知识专家65 +的知识专家65 +测量了低健康识字的ParticAdityAdults。调查管理两组。使用最糟糕的缩放方法,我们评估了13种不同方式的相对偏好来解释停止筛选结肠镜检查。我们使用条件逻辑回归来量化每个解释的相对偏好,其中更高的偏好重量表示更强的偏好。我们分别分析了每个样品,然后使用Spearman的相关系数比较了两个样品,似然比测试评估两组偏好重量之间的总体差异,以及沃尔德检验,以评估每个单独的短语的偏好重量的差异。响应从两个样品高度相关(Spearman系数0.92,P <0.0001)。解释停止筛查结肠镜检查的最优选短语是“您的其他健康问题应该优先考虑”。对于这两个组的三个最不优选的选择对于两个组也是如此,最不喜欢的是“医生没有解释”。低健康识字群更优选的是,低健康识字群更优选的解释,而国家调查组(所有P <0.001)更优选“不太可能受益”和“危害高风险”的解释。结案多年两种不同的老年人患有不同健康识字水平的群体,临床医生讨论停止筛选结肠镜检查的首选策略具有高度相关性。我们的结果可以提供有关在不同健康识字层面停止较老年人的筛选结肠镜检查的有效沟通。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号