首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >The American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification Examination and State Medical Board Disciplinary Actions: a Population Cohort Study
【24h】

The American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification Examination and State Medical Board Disciplinary Actions: a Population Cohort Study

机译:美国内科委员会维修认证审查和国家医疗委员会纪律处分:人口队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Some have questioned whether successful performance in the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program is meaningful. The association of the ABIM Internal Medicine (IM) MOC examination with state medical board disciplinary actions is unknown. Objective To assess risk of disciplinary actions among general internists who did and did not pass the MOC examination within 10?years of initial certification. Design Historical population cohort study. Participants The population of internists certified in internal medicine, but not a subspecialty, from 1990 through 2003 ( n ?=?47,971). Intervention ABIM IM MOC examination. Setting General internal medicine in the USA. Main Measures The primary outcome measure was time to disciplinary action assessed in association with whether the physician passed the ABIM IM MOC examination within 10?years of initial certification, adjusted for training, certification, demographic, and regulatory variables including state medical board Continuing Medical Education (CME) requirements. Key Results The risk for discipline among physicians who did not pass the IM MOC examination within the 10?year requirement window was more than double than that of those who did pass the examination (adjusted HR 2.09; 95% CI, 1.83 to 2.39). Disciplinary actions did not vary by state CME requirements (adjusted HR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.16), but declined with increasing MOC examination scores (Kendall’s tau-b coefficient =???0.98 for trend, p ?
机译:背景技术有些质疑是否在美国内科委员会(ABIM)的认证(MOC)计划中的成功表现是有意义的。亚比姆内科(IM)MOC审查与国家医疗委员会纪律处分的关联是未知的。目的旨在评估一般的内部专家之间的纪律处分风险,并在10年内未通过MOC考试的初步认证。设计历史人口队列研究。参与内科认证的内科医生人口,但从1990年至2003年(N?= 47,971),而不是亚特色。干预亚比姆IM MOC检查。在美国设定一般内科。主要措施主要成果措施是与医生在10年内通过纪律行动进行纪律行动的时间,以便在初步认证的10年内通过,调整培训,认证,人口和监管变量,包括国家医疗委员会继续医学教育(CME)要求。关键结果在10?年要求窗口中没有通过IM MOC考试的医师纪律的风险窗口不仅仅是通过考试的人(调整的HR 2.09; 95%CI,1.83至2.39)。纪律处分没有州CME要求(调整的HR 1.02; 95%CI,0.94至1.16),但随着MOC检查分数的增加(KENDALL的TAU-B系数= ??? 0.98,趋势,P?<0.001) 。在纪律处的医生中,行动在10年的要求窗口中通过IM MoC检查的行动比在未通过考试的人中的那些。结论通过定期评估医学知识与国家医疗委员会纪律行动减少有关,与患者和专业有关的重要质量结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号