首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Effectiveness of Policies and Programs to Combat Adult Obesity: a Systematic Review
【24h】

Effectiveness of Policies and Programs to Combat Adult Obesity: a Systematic Review

机译:政策和计划对成年肥胖的效力:系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundThis systematic review identifies programs, policies, and built-environment changes targeting prevention and control of adult obesity and evaluates their effectiveness.MethodsWe searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EconLit from January 2000 to March 2018. We included natural experiment studies evaluating a program, policy, or built-environment change targeting adult obesity and reporting weight/body mass index (BMI). Studies were categorized by primary intervention target: physical activity/built environment, food/beverage, messaging, or multiple. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias for each study using the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool.ResultsOf 158 natural experiments targeting obesity, 17 reported adult weight/BMI outcomes. Four of 9 studies reporting on physical activity/built environment demonstrated reduced weight/BMI, although effect sizes were small with low strength of evidence and high risk of bias. None of the 5 studies targeting the food/beverage environment decreased weight/BMI; strength of evidence was low, and 2 studies were rated high risk of bias.DiscussionWe identified few natural experiments reporting on the effectiveness of programs, policies, and built-environment changes on adult obesity. Overall, we found no evidence that policies intending to promote physical activity and healthy eating had beneficial effects on weight/BMI and most studies had a high risk of bias. Limitations include few studies met our inclusion criteria; excluded studies in children and those not reporting on weight/BMI outcomes; weight/BMI reporting was very heterogeneous. More high-quality research, including natural experiments studies, is critical for informing the population-level effectiveness of obesity prevention and control initiatives in adults.
机译:Backgrounds系统审查确定了计划,政策和内置环境变化,其定位预防和控制成人肥胖症,并评估其有效性。近期从2000年1月到2018年3月搜索了PubMed,Cinahl,Psycinfo和Econlit的效果。我们包括评估计划的自然实验研究,政策或内置环境变更针对成年肥胖和报告权重/体重指数(BMI)。通过初级干预目标分类研究:物理活动/建筑环境,食品/饮料,消息传递或多个。两位审稿人使用有效的公共卫生实践项目工具独立评估每项研究偏见的风险.158天然实验,靶向肥胖,17例报告成人重量/ BMI结果。 9项关于身体活动/建造环境的研究中的四项展示了减肥/ BMI,但效果大小很小,证据强度低,偏差风险高。靶向食品/饮料环境的5项研究中没有一个重量/ BMI;证据强度低,2项研究被评为高风险的偏见.Discussionwe确定了很少的自然实验,报告了方案,政策和内置环境变化的有效性。总体而言,我们发现没有证据表明,有意促进身体活动和健康饮食的政策对体重/ BMI有益的影响,并且大多数研究具有很高的偏见风险。限制包括少数研究达到了我们的纳入标准;在儿童和未报告重量/ BMI结果的人中排除了研究;重量/ BMI报告非常异质。更高质量的研究,包括自然实验研究,对于告知成人肥胖预防和控制倡议的人口水平效力至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号