首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Impact of Healthcare Delivery System Type on Clinical, Utilization, and Cost Outcomes of Patient-Centered Medical Homes: a Systematic Review
【24h】

Impact of Healthcare Delivery System Type on Clinical, Utilization, and Cost Outcomes of Patient-Centered Medical Homes: a Systematic Review

机译:医疗保健系统类型对患者中心医疗临床,利用率和成本结果的影响:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundAs healthcare reimbursement shifts from being volume to value-focused, new delivery models aim to coordinate care and improve quality. The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model is one such model that aims to deliver coordinated, accessible healthcare to improve outcomes and decrease costs. It is unclear how the types of delivery systems in which PCMHs operate differentially impact outcomes. We aim to describe economic, utilization, quality, clinical, and patient satisfaction outcomes resulting from PCMH interventions operating within integrated delivery and finance systems (IDFS), government systems including Veterans Administration, and non-integrated delivery systems.MethodsWe searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase from 2004 to 2017. Observational studies and clinical trials occurring within the USA that met PCMH criteria (as defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality), addressed ambulatory adults, and reported utilization, economic, clinical, processes and quality of care, or patient satisfaction outcomes.ResultsSixty-four studies were included. Twenty-four percent were within IDFS, 29% were within government systems, and 47% were within non-IDFS. IDFS studies reported decreased emergency department use, primary care use, and cost relative to other systems after PCMH implementation. Government systems reported increased primary care use relative to other systems after PCMH implementation. Clinical outcomes, processes and quality of care, and patient satisfaction were assessed heterogeneously or infrequently.DiscussionPublished articles assessing PCMH interventions generally report improved outcomes related to utilization and cost. IDFS and government systems exhibit different outcomes relative to non-integrated systems, demonstrating that different health systems and populations may be particularly sensitive to PCMH interventions. Both the definition of PCMH interventions and outcomes measured are heterogeneous, limiting the ability to perform direct comparisons or meta-analysis.
机译:Backgroundsas SearchsCare报销从卷转移到重点,新的交付模型旨在协调护理和提高质量。以患者为中心的医疗家庭(PCMH)模型是一个这样的模型,旨在提供协调,无障碍的医疗保健,以改善结果和降低成本。目前尚不清楚PCMHS运行差异影响结果的传送系统类型。我们的目标是描述由在综合交付和金融系统(IDF)内运营的PCMH干预措施,包括退伍军人管理和非综合交付系统的经济,利用,质量,临床和患者满意度结果,以及非综合交付系统。赤列搜索的Cochmmedswe图书馆和Embase从2004年到2017年。美国内部发生的观察研究和临床试验,符合PCMH标准(由医疗保健研究和质量的机构所定义),涉及外国人成人,以及报告的利用,经济,临床,工艺和质量小心或患者满意结果。包括索列索入四项研究。在IDF中的二十四个百分比,29%的政府系统内,47%在非IDF中。 IDFS研究报告称,在PCMH实施后,急诊部门使用,初级保健使用以及相对于其他系统的成本。政府系统报告了PCMH实施后相对于其他系统的初级保健使用。临床结果,护理过程和质量,以及患者满意度是异质的或不经常的评估。评估PCMH干预的探测文章通常会报告与利用和成本相关的改进结果。 IDFS和政府系统相对于非综合系统表现出不同的结果,表明不同的健康系统和群体对PCMH干预可能对PCMH干预特别敏感。测量的PCMH干预和结果的定义都是异质的,限制了执行直接比较或荟萃分析的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号