...
首页> 外文期刊>JPC Bulletin on Iron & Steel >Gastrojejunostomy versus duodenal stent placement for gastric outlet obstruction in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer
【24h】

Gastrojejunostomy versus duodenal stent placement for gastric outlet obstruction in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer

机译:GastrojejunoStomy与无可切征胰腺癌患者胃出口梗阻的十二指肠支架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

AbstractBackground/ObjectiveWhether gastrojejunostomy (GJJ) or duodenal stent (DS) placement is preferable for treatment of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer is unclear. We compared the usefulness of GJJ with that of DS placement in these patients.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 66 consecutive patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who underwent GJJ or DS placement for symptomatic GOO.ResultsWe analyzed 30 patients who underwent GJJ and 23 who underwent DS placement. Peritoneal metastasis was more common in the DS group. Median survival after the first intervention was similar in both groups. Although clinical success (maintaining a GOO Scoring System score ≥2 for more than 7 days) rate was significantly higher in the GJJ group (100% vs. 81%), clinical benefit (maintaining a score ≥2 for more than half of their survival after the first intervention) rate was similar between the GJJ and DS groups (66.7% vs. 69.7%), even among patients who survived for ≥90 days (73.3% vs. 75.0%). Further, the proportion of patients who could receive planned chemotherapy after the first intervention was higher and the time to administration of chemotherapy was significantly shorter in the DS group (9 vs. 32 days). Major complication rate was similar in both groups.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that DS placement is as effective as GJJ for the treatment of GOO in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, even in those with a long life expectancy. DS placement might be more beneficial than GJJ in patients for whom chemotherapy is planned.]]>
机译:<![CDATA [ 抽象 背景/目标 胃肠杂乱术(GJJ)或十二指肠支架(DS)放置优选用于治疗胃出口梗阻(GOO),患者不可切除的胰腺癌尚不清楚。将GJJ与DS放置的有用性与这些患者进行了比较。 方法 我们回顾性地审查了66名连续的胰腺癌患者,患有GJJ或DS放置症状goo。 结果 我们分析了30名接受GJJ和23的患者接受DS安置的患者。腹膜转移在DS组中更常见。在第一次干预后的中位生存在两组中相似。虽然GJJ集团的临床成功(维持GOO评分系统得分≥2以上超过7天)的速率显着高,但临床效益(维持分数≥2以上的成本在第一种干预后,GJJ和DS组之间的速率相似(66.7%对69.7%),即使在≥90天内存活的患者(73.3%vs.75.0%)。此外,在第一次干预后,可以获得计划化疗的患者的比例较高,并且在DS组(9 vs.32天)中较短的化疗施用时间明显短。两组主要并发症率相似。 结论 这些发现表明DS放置与GJJ为治疗有效粘性患者患有不可切征的胰腺癌,甚至在寿命长的人中。 DS放置可能比计划化疗的患者的GJJ更有益。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号