首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Tribology >A Comparative Study on Equivalent Modeling of Rough Surfaces Contact
【24h】

A Comparative Study on Equivalent Modeling of Rough Surfaces Contact

机译:粗糙表面触点等效建模的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Greenwood and Tripp (GT model) have proposed that the contact analysis of two rough surfaces (two-rough-surface contact model) could be considered as an equivalent rough surface in contact with a rigid flat (single-rough-surface contact model). In this paper, by virtue of finite element method, the normal contact analysis was performed with two-rough-surface contact model and its equivalent single-rough-surface contact model, and it was verified that the resultant normal contact forces are in good agreement with each other for these two models, meanwhile the equivalent stress is a little bit lower for two-rough-surface model due to shoulder-to-shoulder contact. In contrast, the sliding contact analysis was also performed with these two models, respectively, and the results show a great disparity with each other in all contact parameters due to the strong plowing effects in two-rough-surface model. Therefore, this equivalence approach proposed by Greenwood and Tripp is only valid for normal contact of rough surfaces and not valid for sliding contact.
机译:Greenwood和Tripp(GT模型)提出了两个粗糙表面(双粗糙表面接触型号)的接触分析可以被认为是与刚性平面(单粗糙表面接触型号)接触的等效粗糙表面。本文凭借有限元方法,采用双粗糙表面触点型号及其等效单粗糙表面接触模型进行正常接触分析,验证了所得正常接触力良好对于这两种型号,彼此相同,同时,由于肩部接触,两粗糙表面模型的等效应力是稍低的。相反,由于两粗糙表面模型中的强耕作效应,也分别用这两种模型进行了这两种模型的滑动接触分析,并且结果在所有接触参数中彼此出现巨大差异。因此,Greenwood和Tripp提出的这种等同方法仅适用于粗糙表面的正常接触,而不适用于滑动接触。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号