首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Tribology >Discrete Greenwood-Williamson Modeling of Rough Surface Contact Accounting for Three-Dimensional Sinusoidal Asperities and Asperity Interaction
【24h】

Discrete Greenwood-Williamson Modeling of Rough Surface Contact Accounting for Three-Dimensional Sinusoidal Asperities and Asperity Interaction

机译:离散的Greenwood-Williamson建模粗糙表面接触的三维正弦粗糙度和粗糙互动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The Greenwood-Williamson (GW) model has been one of the commonly used contact models to study rough surface contact problems during the past decades. While this has been a successful model, it still has a number of restrictions: (i) surface asperities are spheres; (ii) the overall deformation must be assumed to be small enough, such that there is no interaction between asperities, i.e., they are independent of each other; and (iii) asperity deformation remains elastic. This renders the GW model unrealistic in many situations. In the present work, we resolve above restrictions in a discrete version of the GW model: instead of spherical asperities, we assumed that the surface consists of three-dimensional sinusoidal asperities which appear more similar to asperities on a rough surface. For single asperity mechanical response, we propose a Hertz-like analytical solution for purely elastic deformation and a semi-analytical solution based on finite element method (FEM) for elastic-plastic deformation. The asperity interaction is accounted for by discretely utilizing a modified Boussinesq solution without consideration of asperity merger. It is seen that the asperity interaction effect is more than just the delay of contact as shown in the statistical model, it also contributes to the loss of linearity between the contact force and the contact area. Our model also shows that: for elastic contact, using spherical asperities results in a larger average contact pressure than using sinusoids; when plasticity is taken into account, using a sphere to represent asperities results in a softer response as compared with using sinusoids. It is also confirmed that sinusoidal asperities are a much better description than spheres, by comparison with fully resolved FEM simulation results for computer-generated rough surfaces.
机译:Greenwood-Williamson(GW)模型一直是在过去几十年中研究粗糙表面接触问题的常用联络模型之一。虽然这是一个成功的模型,但它仍然有许多限制:(i)表面粗糙是球形; (ii)必须假设整体变形足够小,使得在抑制率之间没有相互作用,即,它们彼此独立; (iii)粗糙变形仍然是弹性的。这在许多情况下使GW模型不切实际。在目前的工作中,我们在GW模型的离散版本中解决了以下限制:而不是球形粗糙,我们认为表面由三维正弦粗糙度组成,这些粗糙度与粗糙表面上的粗糙度更类似于粗糙度。对于单一粗糙机械响应,我们提出了一种棘手的分析解决方案,用于纯弹性变形和基于有限元法(FEM)的半分析溶液,用于弹性塑性变形。通过不考虑粗糙合并的不考虑修改的BoussinesQ解决方案,通过离散地进行粗糙相互作用。可以看出,由于统计模型所示,粗糙相互作用效果仅仅是延迟的延迟,它也有助于接触力与接触面积之间的线性损失。我们的模型还表明:对于弹性接触,使用球形粗糙度导致平均接触压力较大,而不是使用正弦曲线;当考虑可塑性时,与使用正弦曲线相比,使用球体表示抑制器导致更软的响应。还证实,通过与计算机产生的粗糙表面的完全解决的有限元模拟结果进行比较,正弦粗糙度是比球体更好的描述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号