首页> 外文期刊>Journal of tropical pediatrics. >A Comparison of Point of Care C-Reactive Protein Test to Standard C-Reactive Protein Laboratory Measurement in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Setting
【24h】

A Comparison of Point of Care C-Reactive Protein Test to Standard C-Reactive Protein Laboratory Measurement in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Setting

机译:在新生重症监护室环境中对标准C反应蛋白实验室测量的护理C-反应蛋白检验的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Biomarkers assist in diagnosing neonatal sepsis but often provide results 6 to 48 h later. Bedside C-reactive protein (CRP) test may help to expedite clinical management. We assessed the performance of point of care test (POCT) CRP against routine laboratory analysis and determined the time difference in obtaining results. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over 4 months. Neonates clinically indicated, had CRP simultaneously tested using the POCT and laboratory assays. Results: Using similar decision cut-off values of 10mg/l, POCT compared favourably to laboratory testing. The median times to POCT result was 4 min whereas laboratory results were entered at a median of 4.1 h (95th percentile 8h) but only checked after 5.5 h (95th percentile 19.8 h). Conclusions: POCT may be a quick and reliable method to determine CRP. It may rationalize antibiotic usage, allow for earlier patient discharge and reduce overall patient management cost.
机译:背景:生物标志物有助于诊断新生儿败血症,但经常在以后提供6至48小时。 床头C-反应蛋白(CRP)试验可能有助于加快临床管理。 我们评估了护理时间点(POCT)CRP对常规实验室分析的表现,并确定了获得结果的时间差。 方法:预期观察研究有超过4个月进行。 新生儿临床表明,使用POCT和实验室测定同时测试CRP。 结果:使用类似的决策截止值10mg / L,POCT比较实验室检测。 POCT结果的中位数是4分钟,而实验室结果进入4.1小时(第95百分位数8h)的中位数,但仅在5.5小时后检查(第95百分位数19.8小时)。 结论:POCT可能是一种快速可靠的方法来确定CRP。 它可以合理化抗生素使用,允许早期的患者放电,减少整体患者管理成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号