...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of traumatic stress >Validation of Abbreviated Four‐ and Eight‐Item Versions of the PTSD Checklist for DSM‐5 DSM‐5 in a Traumatically Injured Sample
【24h】

Validation of Abbreviated Four‐ and Eight‐Item Versions of the PTSD Checklist for DSM‐5 DSM‐5 in a Traumatically Injured Sample

机译:在创伤的样本中验证DSM-5 DSM-5的PTSD核对表的缩写4和八件版本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are three times higher in traumatically injured populations than the general population, yet limited brief, valid measures for assessing PTSD symptom severity exist. The PTSD Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5) is a valid, efficient measure of symptom severity, but its completion is time consuming. Subsequently, abbreviated four‐ and eight‐item versions were developed using the Mini‐International Neuropsychiatric Interview–7 PTSD module and validated in Veteran samples. This study aimed to validate these abbreviated versions using the Clinician‐Administered PTSD Scale for DSM‐5 (CAPS‐5), the gold standard for PTSD diagnosis, in a traumatically injured civilian population. Participants were 251 traumatically injured adults ( M age = 42.52 years; 69.3% male; 50.2% Caucasian) recruited from a Level 1 trauma center inpatient unit; 32.3% and 17.9% of participants experienced a motor vehicle crash or gunshot wound, respectively. The CAPS‐5 and PCL‐5 were administered approximately 6.5 months postinjury. We examined whether compared to the full PCL‐5, the abbreviated versions would adequately differentiate between participants with and without a CAPS‐5 PTSD diagnosis. The abbreviated versions were highly correlated with the total scale and showed good‐to‐excellent internal consistency. The diagnostic utility of the abbreviated measures was comparable to that of the total scale regarding sensitivity, suggesting they may be useful as abbreviated screening tools; however, the total scale functioned better regarding specificity. The abbreviated versions of the PCL‐5 may be useful screening instruments in the long‐term care of traumatic injury survivors and may be more likely to be implemented across routine clinical and research contexts.
机译:摘要出版伤害患者(PTSD)的创伤性损伤率比一般人群更高三倍,但尚未有限的简要介绍,有效评估应激障碍症状严重程度。 DSM-5(PCL-5)的PTSD清单是有效,有效的症状严重程度,但其完成是耗时的。随后,使用迷你国际神经精神学访谈-7 PTSD模块开发了缩写的四个和八件版本,并在退伍军人样本中验证。本研究旨在使用临床医生的PTSD规模验证这些缩写版本,用于DSM-5(CAPS-5),PTSD诊断的黄金标准,在创伤的平民人口中。参与者是251名创伤的成年人(M年龄= 42.52岁; 69.3%的男性; 50.2%白种人)从1级创伤中心住院单位招募; 32.3%和17.9%的参与者分别经历了机动车崩溃或枪伤。 POSP-5和PCL-5施用了大约6.5个月的jurgury。我们检查了与完整PCL-5相比,缩写版本是否会充分区分参与者,没有帽-5的PTSD诊断。缩写版本与总规模高度相关,并显示出良好的内部一致性。缩写措施的诊断效用与敏感性的总规模相当,表明它们可能是缩写筛选工具;然而,总规模更好地在特异性上发挥作用。 PCL-5的缩写版本可以是创伤性损伤幸存者的长期护理中的有用的筛查仪器,并且可能更有可能在常规临床和研究环境中实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号