首页> 外文期刊>Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine >Differential expression of GAP-43 and neurofilament during peripheral nerve regeneration through bioartificial conduits
【24h】

Differential expression of GAP-43 and neurofilament during peripheral nerve regeneration through bioartificial conduits

机译:通过生物纯粹导管,间隙神经再生过程中间隙-33和神经膜的差异表达

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Nerve conduits are promising alternatives for repairing nerve gaps; they provide a close microenvironment that supports nerve regeneration. In this sense, histological analysis of axonal growth is a determinant to achieve successful nerve regeneration. To evaluate this process, the most-used immunohistochemical markers are neurofilament (NF), beta-III tubulin and, infrequently, GAP-43. However, GAP-43 expression in long-term nerve regeneration models is still poorly understood. In this study we analysed GAP-43 expression and its correlation with NF and S-100, using three tissue-engineering approaches with different regeneration profiles. A 10 mm gap was created in the sciatic nerve of 12 rats and repaired using collagen conduits or collagen conduits filled with fibrin-agarose hydrogels or with hydrogels containing autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs). After 12 weeks the conduits were harvested for histological analysis. Our results confirm the long-term expression of GAP-43 in all groups. The expression of GAP-43 and NF was significantly higher in the group with ADMSCs. Interestingly, GAP-43 was observed in immature, newly formed axons and NF in thicker and mature axons. These proteins were not co-expressed, demonstrating their differential expression in newly formed nerve fascicles. Our descriptive and quantitative histological analysis of GAP-43 and NFL allowed us to determine, with high accuracy, the heterogenic population of axons at different stages of maturation in three tissue-engineering approaches. Finally, to perform a complete assessment of axonal regeneration, the quantitative immunohistochemical evaluation of both GAP-43 and NF could be a useful quality control in tissue engineering. Copyright (C) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:神经管道是有前途的修复神经间隙的替代品;它们提供了一种紧密的微环境,支持神经再生。从这个意义上讲,轴突生长的组织学分析是实现成功神经再生的决定因素。为了评估该过程,最常用的免疫组织化学标记是神经丝(NF),β-III微管蛋白,并且不经常,间隙-33。然而,长期神经再生模型中的GAP-43表达仍然很差。在该研究中,我们使用具有不同再生轮廓的三种组织 - 工程方法分析了GAP-43表达及其与NF和S-100的相关性。在12只大鼠的坐骨神经中产生10mm间隙,并使用粘接纤维蛋白 - 琼脂糖水凝胶的胶原管或胶原导管进行修复,或者用含有自体脂肪衍生的间充质干细胞(ACMSC)的水凝胶。 12周后,收获管道以进行组织学分析。我们的结果证实了所有群体中的GAP-43的长期表达。本组的GAP-43和NF的表达显着高于ACMSCS。有趣的是,在较厚和成熟的轴突中在不成熟,新形成的轴突和NF中观察到GAP-43。这些蛋白质未表达,证明了它们在新形成的神经束中的差异表达。我们对GAP-43和NFL的描述性和定量组织学分析使我们能够高精度地确定在三种组织工程方法中的不同成熟阶段的轴突的异源群。最后,为了对轴突再生进行完全评估,间隙-33和NF的定量免疫组织化学评估可以是组织工程中有用的质量控制。版权所有(c)2014 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号