首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. >CODE, COPYING, COMPETITION: THE SUBVERSIVE FORCE OF PARA-COPYRIGHT AND THE NEED FOR AN UNFAIR COMPETITION BASED REASSESSMENT OF DRM LAWS AFTER INFOPAQ
【24h】

CODE, COPYING, COMPETITION: THE SUBVERSIVE FORCE OF PARA-COPYRIGHT AND THE NEED FOR AN UNFAIR COMPETITION BASED REASSESSMENT OF DRM LAWS AFTER INFOPAQ

机译:代码,复制,竞争:议案 - 版权的颠覆力以及INFOPAQ后基于DRM法律的不公平竞争的需求

获取原文
           

摘要

There has been much debate on the interface between protection by technological protection measures (TPM) and substantive copyright law, and particularly so following the implementation of Article 6 of Directive 2001/29/EC in national laws,~1 which provides the general framework forTPM protection in the European Union. Digital rights management's (DRM's) technological protection measures afford, on a factual level, absolute protection to information, functioning as a code to distinguish exclusion and inclusion. Normative rules endorsing and, indeed, supporting their application can hardly co-exist with a normative system that allocates rights only where certain clear conditions are met. It will be argued here that regulating TPMs as a means of enforcing copyright law is misguided, shifting the debate towards topoi relating exclusively to copyright as a system protecting individual creativity against what may roughly be identified as a public domain debate. This risks missing the fundamental distinction between protecting market interests in general and protecting individual works of authorship.
机译:通过技术保护措施(TPM)和实质性版权法之间的保护与实质性法律之间的界面有很大的辩论,特别是在国家法律中实施指令2001/29 /欧共体第6条,〜1提供总框架Fortpm在欧盟保护。数字版权管理(DRM)技术保护措施,在事实层面上提供绝对保护信息,作为区分排除和包容的代码。实际上,支持其申请的规范性规则可能几乎不能与每个规范的系统一起共存,该系统仅在满足某些清晰条件的情况下分配权限。这里将争辩说,将TPMS作为执行版权法的手段被误导,将辩论转移到Topoi,其专门与版权相关,作为保护个人创造力,以保护个人创造力,以粗略被确定为公共领域的辩论。这种风险缺少保护市场利益的基本区分,并保护个人作者的个人作品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号