首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : >Measurement of pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, and central pulse pressure in atrial fibrillation: a proof of concept study
【24h】

Measurement of pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, and central pulse pressure in atrial fibrillation: a proof of concept study

机译:心房颤动中脉搏波速度,增强指数和中央脉冲压力的测量:概念研究证明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Individualized weighing of the risk benefit of anticoagulation is recommended in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have low established risk scores or, conversely, are at increased risk for bleeding. Parameters of arterial stiffness and wave reflection could improve risk stratification, but their use has not been evaluated in arrhythmia. We measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), central augmentation index (AI), and central pulse pressure (CPP) using the SphygmoCor system in 34 patients (53 to 85 years; 25 males) with AF before and after elective electrical cardioversion. Agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the coefficient of variation, completed with Bland-Altman plots. After cardioversion, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) decreased significantly by 8 mmHg and 18 bpm, respectively. PWV decreased from 11.8 m/s to 10.7 m/s, AI increased from 24% to 29%, and CPP rose from 38 mmHg to 43 mmHg. The decrease in PWV was related to the decrease in MAP (beta = 0.57; R-2 = 0.33; P .001), whereas changes in AI and CPP were related to the decrease in HR (AI: beta = 0.59; R-2 = 0.35; P .001, CPP: beta = 0.55; R-2 = 0.28; P =.001). After adjustment for changes in MAP and HR, reliability analysis showed an excellent agreement for PWV (ICC = 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-0.95) but moderate agreement for AI (ICC = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.17-0.80). Excellent agreement was also found for CPP (ICC = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.720.95). Measurement of PWV and CPP is reliable in patients with AF, as they appear unaffected by the presence of arrhythmia. (C) 2018 American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
机译:在具有较低的风险评分或相反地的心房颤动(AF)的患者中建议使用抗凝血的风险益处的抗凝患者的风险益处,或者相反,患有出血的风险增加。动脉僵硬度和波反射的参数可以改善风险分层,但它们的使用尚未在心律失常中进行评估。使用34名患者(53至85岁; 25岁)的血管基脉搏系统测量颈动脉慢脉搏波速度(PWV),中央增强指数(AI)和中央脉冲压力(CPP)。 。使用Bland-Altman Plots完成了使用内部相关系数(ICC)和变异系数来评估协议。在心脏致氢后,平均动脉血压(MAP)和心率(HR)分别在8mmHg和18bpm显着降低。 PWV从11.8米/秒降至10.7米/秒,AI从24%增加到29%,CPP从38 mmHg上升到43 mmHg。 PWV的降低与地图的减少(β= 0.57; R-2 = 0.33; P& .001),而AI和CPP的变化与HR的减少有关(AI:BETA = 0.59; R. -2 = 0.35; P& .001,CPP:β= 0.55; R-2 = 0.28; p = .001)。在调整地图和人力资源的变化后,可靠性分析显示PWV(ICC = 0.89; 95%置信区间(CI):0.79-0.95)但AI(ICC = 0.59; 95%CI:0.17- 0.80)。还发现了CPP的良好协议(ICC = 0.89; 95%CI:0.720.95)。随着AF的患者,PWV和CPP的测量是可靠的,因为它们显得不受心律失常存在的影响。 (c)2018年美国心脏协会。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号